LRD RUSTIC RD R3
Carrying LRD RUSTIC RD R3 over BLUE CREEK
0.1M S JCT STH 128, St. Croix, Wisconsin
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: LRD RUSTIC RD R3
The LRD RUSTIC RD R3 bridge in St. Croix, Wisconsin carries LRD RUSTIC RD R3 over BLUE CREEK. It was built in 1973, making it 53 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete continuous and spans 2 sections, stretching 7.2 meters (24 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 269 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Wisconsin bridges. It is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds. Its NBI inventory load rating is 32.4 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How LRD RUSTIC RD R3 compares
Live comparison across Wisconsin.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1973
- Material
- Concrete Continuous
- Number of Spans
- 2
- Structure Length
- 7.2 m (24 ft)
- Deck Width
- 7.9 m (26 ft)
- Owner
- Town/Township Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 269 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- P55096500000000
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether LRD RUSTIC RD R3 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare LRD RUSTIC RD R3 against other structures in St. Croix and across Wisconsin. Wisconsin bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for LRD RUSTIC RD R3?
LRD RUSTIC RD R3 in St. Croix, Wisconsin on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is LRD RUSTIC RD R3 inspected?
LRD RUSTIC RD R3's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 269 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. LRD RUSTIC RD R3 is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for LRD RUSTIC RD R3?
LRD RUSTIC RD R3 has an NBI inventory load rating of 32.4 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining LRD RUSTIC RD R3?
LRD RUSTIC RD R3 is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.
How old is LRD RUSTIC RD R3 and does age affect safety?
LRD RUSTIC RD R3 was built in 1973, making it 53 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.