DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD
Carrying DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD over NEW CANAL
SEC 36 T 6S R10W B, Tunica, Mississippi
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD
The DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD bridge in Tunica, Mississippi carries DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD over NEW CANAL. It was built in 2005, making it 21 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 2 sections, stretching 8.0 meters (26 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 250 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Mississippi bridges. It is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 8/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 34.3 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD compares
Live comparison across Mississippi.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2005
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 2
- Structure Length
- 8.0 m (26 ft)
- Owner
- County Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 250 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- SA7200000000031
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD against other structures in Tunica and across Mississippi. Mississippi bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD?
DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD in Tunica, Mississippi on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD inspected?
DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 250 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD?
DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD has an NBI inventory load rating of 34.3 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD?
DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
How old is DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD and does age affect safety?
DUNDEE-CRENSHAW RD was built in 2005, making it 21 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.