FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

200 NORTH STREET

Carrying 200 NORTH STREET over WEBER-PROVO DIV. CANAL

125 W. 200 N. KAMAS, Summit, Utah

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Good
36 t Inventory load rating Higher than 62% of rated Utah bridges

200 NORTH STREET in Summit, Utah sits above 62% of rated Utah bridges on inventory load rating (36 t), while its 2007 build year is earlier than 17% of Summit's recorded-year cohort (138 bridges).

200 NORTH STREET in Summit, Utah is rated Good in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 2007, it carries 1 rated component on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 7. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Good result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure UT:043050E

POST-2000 · CONCRETE · SINGLE-SPAN · CULVERT-LED · LOCAL-ADT · STANDARD-LOAD · CAT-GOOD

  • POST-2000 2000+
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • SINGLE-SPAN Single span
  • CULVERT-LED Culvert-led
  • LOCAL-ADT Local ADT
  • STANDARD-LOAD Standard load
  • CAT-GOOD Good

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: 200 NORTH STREET

The 200 NORTH STREET bridge in Summit, Utah carries 200 NORTH STREET over WEBER-PROVO DIV. CANAL. It was built in 2007, making it 19 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 10.1 meters (33 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 126 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Utah bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

How 200 NORTH STREET compares

▼ 0.1
Load rating vs Utah average (36.4 t; 3,113 of 3,125 rated)
138
Bridges in Summit · 6 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 2007, earlier than 24 of Summit's 138 bridges with a recorded construction year (17%), against a county median build year of 1985. This is one of the newer structures in its county.

200 NORTH STREET 36.3 t
Utah average (3,113 of 3,125 rated) 36.4 t

Live comparison across Utah bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (3,113 of 3,125 rated).

200 NORTH STREET vs every rated Utah bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

36 Top 38% higher than 62% of 3,113 bridges

rated Utah bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Culvert
7/9
Good (7–9)
Inventory Load Rating
36.3 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Good

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Summit inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 138 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
2007
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
1
Structure Length
10.1 m (33 ft)
0
Owner
City/Municipal Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
126 vehicles/day
Structure Number
043050E

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether 200 NORTH STREET is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare 200 NORTH STREET against other structures in Summit and across Utah. Utah bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for 200 NORTH STREET?

200 NORTH STREET in Summit, Utah on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is 200 NORTH STREET inspected?

200 NORTH STREET's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 126 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. 200 NORTH STREET is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for 200 NORTH STREET?

200 NORTH STREET has an NBI inventory load rating of 36.3 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining 200 NORTH STREET?

200 NORTH STREET is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.

How old is 200 NORTH STREET and does age affect safety?

200 NORTH STREET was built in 2007, making it 19 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.