FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

C2005

Carrying C2005 over OTTER CREEK

0.3 MI TO JCT W CL3 TH41, Rutland, Vermont

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Good
33 t Inventory load rating Lower than 66% of rated Vermont bridges

C2005 in Rutland, Vermont sits above 34% of rated Vermont bridges on inventory load rating (33 t), while its 1992 build year is earlier than 26% of Rutland's recorded-year cohort (266 bridges).

C2005 in Rutland, Vermont is rated Good in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1992, it carries 3 rated components on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 7. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Good result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure VT:101102001111021

LATE-CENTURY · STEEL · SINGLE-SPAN · SUB-LED · LOCAL-ADT · STANDARD-LOAD · CAT-GOOD

  • LATE-CENTURY 1980–1999
  • STEEL Steel
  • SINGLE-SPAN Single span
  • SUB-LED Substructure-led
  • LOCAL-ADT Local ADT
  • STANDARD-LOAD Standard load
  • CAT-GOOD Good

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: C2005

The C2005 bridge in Rutland, Vermont carries C2005 over OTTER CREEK. It was built in 1992, making it 34 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel and spans 1 section, stretching 41.5 meters (136 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 500 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Vermont bridges. It is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 8/9, superstructure at 8/9, substructure at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

How C2005 compares

▼ 4.7
Load rating vs Vermont average (37.4 t; 2,861 of 2,862 rated)
266
Bridges in Rutland · 7 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1992, earlier than 69 of Rutland's 266 bridges with a recorded construction year (26%), against a county median build year of 1971. This is one of the newer structures in its county.

C2005 32.7 t
Vermont average (2,861 of 2,862 rated) 37.4 t

Live comparison across Vermont bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (2,861 of 2,862 rated).

C2005 vs every rated Vermont bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

33 Top 66% higher than 34% of 2,861 bridges

rated Vermont bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Deck
8/9
Good (7–9)
Superstructure
8/9
Good (7–9)
Substructure
7/9
Good (7–9)
Inventory Load Rating
32.7 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Good

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Reported 0–9 component ratings from the FHWA NBI. The highlighted component is the lowest reported input to this record’s current condition category; it is not a closure or live crossing-safety decision.

Rutland inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 266 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1992
Material
Steel
Number of Spans
1
Structure Length
41.5 m (136 ft)
Deck Width
9.4 m (31 ft)
Owner
Town/Township Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
500 vehicles/day
Structure Number
101102001111021

Condition Analysis

  • The deck (driving surface) rates good at 8/9, with no significant deterioration on file.
  • At 8/9, the superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in good shape and shows no significant wear.
  • The substructure (piers and abutments) rates good at 7/9, with no significant deterioration on file.

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether C2005 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare C2005 against other structures in Rutland and across Vermont. Vermont bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for C2005?

C2005 in Rutland, Vermont has a deck rating of 8/9, superstructure rating of 8/9, and substructure rating of 7/9 on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is C2005 inspected?

C2005's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 500 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. C2005 is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for C2005?

C2005 has an NBI inventory load rating of 32.7 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining C2005?

C2005 is owned and maintained by Town/Township Highway Agency.

How old is C2005 and does age affect safety?

C2005 was built in 1992, making it 34 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.