Total bridges
300
Public highway bridges in DeKalb County
County profile · official public datasets
300 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 31.3% rated Good, 62% Fair, 6.7% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
DeKalb County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, DeKalb County ranks #57 of 67 Alabama counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 6.7%). DeKalb County, Alabama contains 300 public highway bridges. Roughly 31.3% are rated “Good,” 62% “Fair,” and 6.7% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
300
Public highway bridges in DeKalb County
Good condition
31.3%
94 of 300 rated 7-9
Fair condition
62%
186 of 300 rated 5-6
Poor condition
6.7%
20 of 300 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#57 of 67
Among Alabama counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 300 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.3% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 6.7% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 118 crossings a day against 2,655 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 300 of 300 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
208 of the 300 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 31.3% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
COUNTY ROAD 43 over REEDY CREEK, built 1970, carries 534 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 20-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 2,355 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
300 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
Built before 1900
1 bridges
1900–1909
4 bridges
1920–1929
15 bridges
1930–1939
10 bridges
1940–1949
20 bridges
1950–1959
52 bridges
1960–1969
88 bridges
1970–1979
29 bridges
1980–1989
22 bridges
1990–1999
27 bridges
2000–2009
22 bridges
2010–2019
6 bridges
2020–2029
4 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 88 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 29.3% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1967, 7 years older than the Alabama average of 1974.
The 5 Alabama counties nearest DeKalb County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 6.7% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1967 against a peer-group mean of 1971 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 66 Alabama counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington County | 332 | 31.9% | 63% | 5.1% | 1970 |
| Limestone County | 324 | 45.1% | 52.8% | 2.2% | 1972 |
| Jackson County | 314 | 29% | 67.2% | 3.8% | 1961 |
| DeKalb County (this page) | 300 | 31.3% | 62% | 6.7% | 1967 |
| Walker County | 275 | 36.4% | 58.2% | 5.5% | 1974 |
| Morgan County | 271 | 39.1% | 59.4% | 1.5% | 1977 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to DeKalb County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for DeKalb County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside AL (300 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside AL (1967 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: town creek
0.5 mile s of sr 35, DeKalb, AL
Over: LITTLE WILLS CREEK
0.2 MI N OF CHURCH ST, DeKalb, AL
Over: SAUTY CREEK
3 MI N JCT SR75 * SR 35??, DeKalb, AL
Over: LITTLE SCARHAM CRK FORK
T8S R6E SEC. 16, DeKalb, AL
Over: SCARHAM CREEK
1.5 MI SE GERALDINE, DeKalb, AL
Over: HARRIS CREEK
T-4-S R-9-E, DeKalb, AL
Over: TRIB. TO YELLOW CREEK
.6 MI E SR 176 T-9 R-8, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG WILLS CREEK
1MI W CO RT 51 8S 7E, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG WILLS CREEK
0.5 MI E OF US 11, DeKalb, AL
Over: SAUTY CREEK
3 MI N JCT SR 75 * 35, DeKalb, AL
Over: I-59
JCT I59 * US 11, DeKalb, AL
Over: 49TH ST BIG WILLS CREEK
.4MI W. JCT US11 49TH ST., DeKalb, AL
Over: BLACK OAK CREEK
6 MI S JCT SR 35, DeKalb, AL
Over: WHIPPORWILL CREEK
0.5 MI W AL 75 T8R5, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG WILLS CREEK
1.2 MI E OF I59, DeKalb, AL
Over: MUSH CREEK
2.4 MI S JCT CORT68T8SR8E, DeKalb, AL
Over: BRANCH
0.4 MI N JCT SR 40, DeKalb, AL
Over: SOUTH FORK CREEK
T-8-S R-6-E, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG WILLS CREEK
.3.MIE.US11, DeKalb, AL
Over: CANEY CREEK
T6S R8E SECTIONS 16 * 21, DeKalb, AL
Over: Big Wills Creek
360 ft. N of SR 117, DeKalb, AL
Over: TRIB. TO BIG WILLS CREEK
2.6 MI N JCT US 11 T6SR9E, DeKalb, AL
Over: YELLOW CREEK
SEC. 4 T9S R8E, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG WILLS CREEK
0.2 MILE SE GAULT AVE.???, DeKalb, AL
Over: IVY CREEK
BETWEEN PARKER AVE SCOTT, DeKalb, AL
Over: WEST FORK LITTLE RIVER
5 MI NW AL-GA ST LINE, DeKalb, AL
Over: SCARHAM CREEK
1 MI. N.CO.RD.179, DeKalb, AL
Over: SCARHAM CREEK
1 MILE NORTH C.R. 24, DeKalb, AL
Over: BRANCH
3 MI N. ETOWAH CO. LINE, DeKalb, AL
Over: YELLOW CREEK
.3 M E AL 35 T7S R9E, DeKalb, AL
Over: DRY CREEK
2 MI S AL*GA ST LINE, DeKalb, AL
Over: BOYDSTON CREEK
.25 MI E CO RT 142 T3SR10, DeKalb, AL
Over: TRIB. TO BIG WILLS CREEK
2.4MI N JCT US 11 T6SR9E, DeKalb, AL
Over: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR
JCT SR 117 @ N/S RR, DeKalb, AL
Over: DRY CREEK
7.8 MI N JCT SR 68, DeKalb, AL
Over: BRANCH
JCT I59 * SR35, DeKalb, AL
Over: BRANCH
1.3 MI N JCT I59*CORT 140, DeKalb, AL
Over: BEAR CREEK
3.7 MI E JCT CO RD 275, DeKalb, AL
Over: JOHNNYS CREEK
AT INT. WITH CO. RD. 115, DeKalb, AL
Over: IVY CREEK
IN CITY OF RAINSVILLE, DeKalb, AL
Over: SOUTH SAUTY CREEK
T-6-S R-7-E SEC. 12, DeKalb, AL
Over: SANDY FORD CREEK
T4S R9E SEC. 19, DeKalb, AL
Over: BIG BRANCH
T6S R7E SEC. 12, DeKalb, AL
Over: REEDY CREEK
T8S R6E SECTION 2, DeKalb, AL
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.