Total bridges
170
Public highway bridges in Itasca County
County profile · official public datasets
170 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 50% rated Good, 44.7% Fair, 5.3% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Itasca County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Itasca County ranks #59 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5.3%). Itasca County, Minnesota contains 170 public highway bridges. Roughly 50% are rated “Good,” 44.7% “Fair,” and 5.3% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
170
Public highway bridges in Itasca County
Good condition
50%
85 of 170 rated 7-9
Fair condition
44.7%
76 of 170 rated 5-6
Poor condition
5.3%
9 of 170 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#59 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 170 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.9% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5.3% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 411 crossings a day against 847 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 170 of 170 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
52 of the 170 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 50% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
CSAH 17 over POKEGAMA LAKE, built 1955, carries 1,560 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 9-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 3,702 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
170 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
4 bridges
1920–1929
1 bridges
1930–1939
9 bridges
1940–1949
1 bridges
1950–1959
12 bridges
1960–1969
12 bridges
1970–1979
28 bridges
1980–1989
18 bridges
1990–1999
23 bridges
2000–2009
28 bridges
2010–2019
28 bridges
2020–2029
6 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1970s, when 28 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 16.5% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 45 to 54 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1985) matches the Minnesota average (1986).
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Itasca County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5.3% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1985 against a peer-group mean of 1986 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lac qui Parle County | 174 | 73% | 19.5% | 7.5% | 1986 |
| Houston County | 172 | 64% | 33.7% | 2.3% | 1990 |
| Pine County | 171 | 63.2% | 32.2% | 4.7% | 1987 |
| Itasca County (this page) | 170 | 50% | 44.7% | 5.3% | 1985 |
| Watonwan County | 167 | 69.5% | 29.9% | 0.6% | 1978 |
| Morrison County | 164 | 62.2% | 33.5% | 4.3% | 1988 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Itasca County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Itasca County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (170 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1985 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: SNOWBALL CREEK
0.1 MI E OF JCT US 169, Itasca, MN
Over: DEER RIVER
0.6 MI S OF JCT CSAH 19, Itasca, MN
Over: BNSF RR
0.1 MI N OF JCT TH 169, Itasca, MN
Over: MISSISSIPPI RIVER
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 2, Itasca, MN
Over: SWAN RIVER
0.6 MI W OF JCT CSAH 10, Itasca, MN
Over: SWAN RIVER
2.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH 70, Itasca, MN
Over: PIGEON RIVER
4 MI E OF CSAH 46, Itasca, MN
Over: RICE RIVER
1.0 MI E OF JCT TH 38, Itasca, MN
Over: POPPLE RIVER
0.2 MI W OF JCT TH 46, Itasca, MN
Over: SWAN RIVER
0.6 MI S OF JCT CSAH 10, Itasca, MN
Over: MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2.0 MI E OF JCT CSAH 3, Itasca, MN
Over: PRAIRIE RIVER
0.1 MI SW OF JCT CSAH 53, Itasca, MN
Over: JESSIE BROOK
0.4 MI W OF JCT TH 6, Itasca, MN
Over: WAGNER CREEK
1.2 MI S OF JCT CSAH 29, Itasca, MN
Over: OTTER CREEK
0.4 MI E OF JCT CSAH 33, Itasca, MN
Over: MESABI TRAIL
IN COLERAINE, Itasca, MN
Over: W BR FLOODWOOD RIVER
0.8 MI E OF JCT CSAH 25, Itasca, MN
Over: MISSISSIPPI RIVER
0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 2, Itasca, MN
Over: WELCOME CREEK
0.1 MI W OFCOUNTY LINE, Itasca, MN
Over: ST
0.3 MI E OF JCT TH 65, Itasca, MN
Over: PRAIRIE RIVER
2.1 MI W;N OF JCT CSAH 7, Itasca, MN
Over: POHL CREEK
0.9 MI S OF JCT CR 256, Itasca, MN
Over: SOURDOUGH CREEK
0.7 MI N OF JCT CSAH 22, Itasca, MN
Over: BNSF RR SPUR
1.1 MI W OF E. CO. LINE, Itasca, MN
Over: ST
0.3 MI E OF JCT TH 65, Itasca, MN
Over: PRAIRIE RIVER
1.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 60, Itasca, MN
Over: RICE RIVER
4.4 MI S OF JCT CSAH 7, Itasca, MN
Over: STREAM
11.8 MI NE OF REMER, Itasca, MN
Over: BALL CLUB RIVER
3.7 MI W OF JCT TH 46, Itasca, MN
Over: OX HIDE CREEK
1.1 MI S OF S JCT TH 169, Itasca, MN
Over: BASS BROOK
9.8 MI E OF W JCT TH 6, Itasca, MN
Over: BIG FORK RIVER
6.3 MI E OF EFFIE, Itasca, MN
Over: BNSF RR SPUR
1.1 MI W OF E. CO. LINE, Itasca, MN
Over: DEER RIVER
1.8 MI N OF JCT TH 1, Itasca, MN
Over: KITCHI CREEK
1.5 MI E OF CO LINE, Itasca, MN
Over: PELIQUIN CREEK
0.8 MI W OF JCT TH 38, Itasca, MN
Over: DEER CREEK
0.4 MI N OF JCT TH 1, Itasca, MN
Over: PRAIRIE RIVER
2.8 MI E OF GRAND RAPIDS, Itasca, MN
Over: SWAN RIVER
2.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 65, Itasca, MN
Over: POKEGAMA LAKE
5.1 MI S OF W JCT TH 2, Itasca, MN
Over: THIRD RIVER
4.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 32, Itasca, MN
Over: PRAIRIE RIVER
3.8 MI W OF JCT TH 65, Itasca, MN
Over: TURTLE RIVER
1.7 MI E OF JCT TH 6, Itasca, MN
Over: TRAIL
1.8 MI W OF JCT CSAH 16, Itasca, MN
Over: MINE RD
1.8 MI W OF JCT CSAH 16, Itasca, MN
Over: RICE RIVER
0.1 MI E OF JCT TH 38, Itasca, MN
Over: US 169
6.0 MI NE OF E JCT TH 2, Itasca, MN
Over: GROUSE CREEK
12.0 MI N OF DEER RIVER, Itasca, MN
Over: EAST FORK PRAIRIE RIVER
10.0 MI N OF JCT TH 169, Itasca, MN
Over: SPLIT HAND CREEK
3.7 NI NW OF S CO LINE, Itasca, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.