County profile · official public datasets

Itasca County, MN

170 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 50% rated Good, 44.7% Fair, 5.3% Poor.

170
Public bridges
50%
Good condition
5.3%
Poor condition

The verdict

According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.

Itasca County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.

59th
of 87 on Poor share
5.3%
Poor-condition share
170
public highway bridges
1985
avg year built

Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.

Itasca County Bridge Snapshot

According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Itasca County ranks #59 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5.3%). Itasca County, Minnesota contains 170 public highway bridges. Roughly 50% are rated “Good,” 44.7% “Fair,” and 5.3% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.

Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.

Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.

Total bridges

170

Public highway bridges in Itasca County

Good condition

50%

85 of 170 rated 7-9

Fair condition

44.7%

76 of 170 rated 5-6

Poor condition

5.3%

9 of 170 rated 4 or below

In-state Poor-share rank

#59 of 87

Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better

Condition distribution

Share of 170 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.

Good
50% (85)
Fair
44.7% (76)
Poor
5.3% (9)

Itasca County's Poor-condition bridges carry 3,702 vehicle crossings a day

That is 1.9% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5.3% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 411 crossings a day against 847 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.

Computed over the 170 of 170 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.

30.6% of Itasca County's bridges have passed the 50-year mark

52 of the 170 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 50% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.

Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.

One structure carries 42.1% of the county's Poor-condition bridge traffic

CSAH 17 over POKEGAMA LAKE, built 1955, carries 1,560 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 9-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.

Share is of the 3,702 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.

When Itasca County's bridges were built

170 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade

bridges

What this shows Construction peaked in the 1970s, when 28 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 16.5% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 45 to 54 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1985) matches the Minnesota average (1986).

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory (year built) As of 2024 NBI release

How Itasca County compares with Minnesota's closest counties by inventory size

The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Itasca County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5.3% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1985 against a peer-group mean of 1986 is in line with the group.

Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.

Bridge inventory size and condition shares for Itasca County and the 5 Minnesota counties closest to it in inventory size
County Bridges Poor
Lac qui Parle County 174 7.5%
Houston County 172 2.3%
Pine County 171 4.7%
Itasca County (this page) 170 5.3%
Watonwan County 167 0.6%
Morrison County 164 4.3%

Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Itasca County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.

Nationwide counties with similar inventory size or average build year

Two NBI-derived peer sets for Itasca County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.

Similar inventory size

Nearest county inventories outside MN (170 bridges here).

Similar average build year

Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1985 here).

Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.

Poor-condition bridges (9)

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.