Total bridges
162
Public highway bridges in Martin County
County profile · official public datasets
162 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 56.2% rated Good, 34.6% Fair, 9.3% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Martin County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Martin County ranks #83 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 9.3%). Martin County, Minnesota contains 162 public highway bridges. Roughly 56.2% are rated “Good,” 34.6% “Fair,” and 9.3% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
162
Public highway bridges in Martin County
Good condition
56.2%
91 of 162 rated 7-9
Fair condition
34.6%
56 of 162 rated 5-6
Poor condition
9.3%
15 of 162 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#83 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 162 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.3% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 9.3% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 171 crossings a day against 911 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 162 of 162 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
76 of the 162 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 56.2% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
CSAH 53 over CENTER CREEK, built 1930, carries 1,089 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 15-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 2,560 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
162 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
8 bridges
1920–1929
4 bridges
1930–1939
3 bridges
1940–1949
4 bridges
1950–1959
5 bridges
1960–1969
10 bridges
1970–1979
78 bridges
1980–1989
13 bridges
1990–1999
13 bridges
2000–2009
13 bridges
2010–2019
6 bridges
2020–2029
5 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1970s, when 78 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 48.1% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 45 to 54 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1975, 11 years older than the Minnesota average of 1986.
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Martin County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 9.3% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1975 against a peer-group mean of 1985 is 10 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pine County | 171 | 63.2% | 32.2% | 4.7% | 1987 |
| Itasca County | 170 | 50% | 44.7% | 5.3% | 1985 |
| Watonwan County | 167 | 69.5% | 29.9% | 0.6% | 1978 |
| Morrison County | 164 | 62.2% | 33.5% | 4.3% | 1988 |
| Martin County (this page) | 162 | 56.2% | 34.6% | 9.3% | 1975 |
| Kittson County | 160 | 71.9% | 25.6% | 2.5% | 1988 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Martin County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Martin County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (162 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1975 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: LILY CREEK
0.6 MI W OF JCT CSAH 33, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
0.6 MI N OF JCT CR 142, Martin, MN
Over: S FK WATONWAN RIVER
0.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 54, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
0.5 MI S OF JCT CR 142, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
1.2 MI S OF JCT CSAH 44, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
AT W CO LINE, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
0.1 MI N OF JCT CR. 122, Martin, MN
Over: CEDAR RUN
1.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 44, Martin, MN
Over: TH 15
AT THE JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: TH 4
AT THE JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
0.7 MI W OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: CENTER CREEK
1.3 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: CENTER CREEK
1.3 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
1.1 MI S OF JCT CSAH 44, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
3.2 MI W OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
3.9 MI E OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
AT THE JCT TH 262, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
8.2 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: SOUTH CREEK
0.9 MI W OF JCT CR 151, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
2.1 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: TWP 318
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: WILLOW CREEK
0.8 MI N OF JCT CSAH 50, Martin, MN
Over: CEDAR RUN
0.8 MI N OF TRIMONT, Martin, MN
Over: SOUTH CREEK
3.6 MI E OF JCT TH 262, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
6.0 MI W OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
5.1 MI W OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: TWP 318
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: TH 4
AT THE JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: TH 15
AT THE JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: IM RAIL
1.6 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: CEDAR RUN
1.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 44, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
2.0 MI N OF JCT CSAH 8, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
1.2 MI E OF JCT CSAH 38, Martin, MN
Over: LILY CREEK
0.8 MI E OF JCT CSAH 27, Martin, MN
Over: SOUTH CREEK
0.4 MI E OF JCT CSAH 59, Martin, MN
Over: I 90
5.3 MI W OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: CEDAR RUN
0.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 38, Martin, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 11
0.9 MI. E. OF CSAH 19, Martin, MN
Over: LILY CREEK
0.3 MI E OF JCT CSAH 33, Martin, MN
Over: CENTER CREEK
0.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH 32, Martin, MN
Over: CEDAR RUN
0.6 MI S OF N. CO. LINE, Martin, MN
Over: CNW RY (ABAN)
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: IM RAIL
1.5 MI E OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: IM RAIL
1.5 MI E OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: IM RAIL
1.6 MI E OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: TH 263
6.3 MI E OF JCT TH 4, Martin, MN
Over: CNW RY (ABAN)
0.1 MI W OF JCT TH 15, Martin, MN
Over: JUD DITCH # 36
1.9 MI E OF JCT TH 263, Martin, MN
Over: E FK DES MOINES RIVER
0.2 MI N OF JCT CSAH 8, Martin, MN
Over: ELM CREEK
3.0 MI N OF JCT TH 90, Martin, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.