Total bridges
142
Public highway bridges in Roseau County
County profile · official public datasets
142 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 69.7% rated Good, 27.5% Fair, 2.8% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Roseau County posts a better-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Roseau County ranks #33 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 2.8%). Roseau County, Minnesota contains 142 public highway bridges. Roughly 69.7% are rated “Good,” 27.5% “Fair,” and 2.8% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
142
Public highway bridges in Roseau County
Good condition
69.7%
99 of 142 rated 7-9
Fair condition
27.5%
39 of 142 rated 5-6
Poor condition
2.8%
4 of 142 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#33 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 142 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 2.8% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 17 crossings a day against 356 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 142 of 142 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
36 of the 142 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 69.7% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
T 26 over STREAM, built 1922, carries 32 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 4-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 67 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
142 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
2 bridges
1930–1939
1 bridges
1950–1959
7 bridges
1960–1969
17 bridges
1970–1979
22 bridges
1980–1989
21 bridges
1990–1999
20 bridges
2000–2009
34 bridges
2010–2019
12 bridges
2020–2029
6 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2000s, when 34 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 23.9% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 15 to 24 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1989) matches the Minnesota average (1986).
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Roseau County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 2.8% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1989 against a peer-group mean of 1986 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton County | 147 | 51.7% | 39.5% | 8.8% | 1986 |
| Wabasha County | 147 | 60.5% | 39.5% | 0% | 1985 |
| Freeborn County | 142 | 50.7% | 46.5% | 2.8% | 1981 |
| Rice County | 142 | 40.8% | 56.3% | 2.8% | 1986 |
| Roseau County (this page) | 142 | 69.7% | 27.5% | 2.8% | 1989 |
| Renville County | 141 | 66% | 24.1% | 9.9% | 1991 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Roseau County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Roseau County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (142 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1989 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: CO DITCH # 21
0.9 MI W OF JCT CSAH 21, Roseau, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 4
0.1 MI E OF JCT CR 105, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
0.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 18, Roseau, MN
Over: PAULSON CREEK
0.4 MI S OF JCT CR 128, Roseau, MN
Over: STATE DITCH # 95;LAT 1
2.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 23, Roseau, MN
Over: SEVERSON CREEK (CD # 23)
0.5 MI S OF JCT CR 126, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
1.0 MI E OF JCT TH 32, Roseau, MN
Over: S BR TWO RIVERS (SD # 91
0.2 MI S OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
0.5 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
0.9 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
1.3 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
2.6 MI S OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
0.4 MI W OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
1.1 MI S OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
1.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 8, Roseau, MN
Over: STATE DITCH 72
0.1 MI E OF CO LINE, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
1.4 MI N JCT CSAH 2, Roseau, MN
Over: CD # 7
1.1 MI E OF JCT CSAH 9, Roseau, MN
Over: SD # 91 LAT # 4
1.1 MI W JCT MN 32, Roseau, MN
Over: CD # 7 HAY CREEK
1.6 MI N OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: STATE DITCH # 72
0.1 MI S OF JCT CSAH 7, Roseau, MN
Over: DITCH
3.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH 28, Roseau, MN
Over: LAT.1 S.D95
5.7 MI NW OF BADGER, Roseau, MN
Over: CD # 7
0.9 MI N OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: ROSEAU RIVER
0.4 MI E OF JCT CSAH 18, Roseau, MN
Over: WEST INTERCEPTOR
2.0 MI W JCT MN 310, Roseau, MN
Over: WEST INTERCEPTOR
1.5 MI N JCT CSAH 16, Roseau, MN
Over: CD #7
1.4 MI N OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: W BR WARROAD RIVER
2.1 MI W OF JCT CSAH 5, Roseau, MN
Over: ROSEAU R DIVERSION CHAN
0.3 MI E OF JCT CSAH 24, Roseau, MN
Over: HANSEN CREEK
1.5 MI E OF CSAH 18, Roseau, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 21 LAT #1
2.1 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: W BR WARROAD RIVER
1.2 MI W OF JCT CSAH 35, Roseau, MN
Over: W BR WARROAD RIVER
1 MI N; .1 MI W OF CSAH12, Roseau, MN
Over: BADGER CREEK
IN BADGER, Roseau, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 13
4.25 MI W OF W JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: ROSEAU R WATERSHED
1.1 MI W OF JCT TH 310, Roseau, MN
Over: S BR TWO RIVERS
0.5 MI SO OF JCT TH 11, Roseau, MN
Over: S Fk Roseau River
1.6 mi E of jct TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: HAY CREEK
2.0 MI S OF JCT MN 11, Roseau, MN
Over: W BR WARROAD RIVER
2.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 12, Roseau, MN
Over: ROSEAU RIVER
1.8 MI W OF JCT CSAH 9, Roseau, MN
Over: ROSEAU RIVER
0.5 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
1.3 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: Roseau River
0.7 MI W OF JCT CSAH 9, Roseau, MN
Over: S BR TWO RIVERS
0.2 MI S JCT MN 11, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
1.6 MI W OF JCT CSAH 21, Roseau, MN
Over: S FK ROSEAU RIVER
0.8 MI E OF JCT TH 89, Roseau, MN
Over: E BR WARROAD RIVER
0.9 MI E OF JCT CSAH 5, Roseau, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.