Total bridges
233
Public highway bridges in Oswego County
County profile · official public datasets
233 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 28.3% rated Good, 61.4% Fair, 10.3% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Oswego County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Oswego County ranks #37 of 62 New York counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 10.3%). Oswego County, New York contains 233 public highway bridges. Roughly 28.3% are rated “Good,” 61.4% “Fair,” and 10.3% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
233
Public highway bridges in Oswego County
Good condition
28.3%
66 of 233 rated 7-9
Fair condition
61.4%
143 of 233 rated 5-6
Poor condition
10.3%
24 of 233 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#37 of 62
Among New York counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 233 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 5.2% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 10.3% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 1,569 crossings a day against 2,207 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 233 of 233 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
116 of the 233 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 28.3% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
RTE I81 over HALSEY ROAD, built 1961, carries 8,174 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 24-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 37,655 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
233 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
Built before 1900
1 bridges
1900–1909
5 bridges
1910–1919
3 bridges
1920–1929
3 bridges
1930–1939
17 bridges
1940–1949
13 bridges
1950–1959
20 bridges
1960–1969
45 bridges
1970–1979
14 bridges
1980–1989
24 bridges
1990–1999
28 bridges
2000–2009
28 bridges
2010–2019
24 bridges
2020–2029
8 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 45 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 19.3% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1975) matches the New York average (1972).
The 5 New York counties nearest Oswego County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 10.3% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1975 against a peer-group mean of 1969 is 6 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 61 New York counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia County | 243 | 17.7% | 64.2% | 18.1% | 1963 |
| Kings County | 242 | 24.8% | 64% | 11.2% | 1953 |
| Oswego County (this page) | 233 | 28.3% | 61.4% | 10.3% | 1975 |
| Saratoga County | 228 | 46.9% | 45.6% | 7.5% | 1974 |
| Greene County | 227 | 36.6% | 53.7% | 9.7% | 1978 |
| Tioga County | 220 | 38.6% | 52.3% | 9.1% | 1976 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Oswego County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Oswego County, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside NY (233 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside NY (1975 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: Canal View Dr OSWEGO RI
JCT OF RTE 104 + OSWEGO R, Oswego, NY
Over: OSWEGO RIVER
AT HINMANSVILLE;OSWEGO R, Oswego, NY
Over: CATFISH CREEK
2.5 MI NE JCT RTS 3 & 264, Oswego, NY
Over: CSX TRANSPORTATION
.8 MI S JCT US 11 & SH 49, Oswego, NY
Over: SIX MILE CREEK
2.1 MI S JCT SH 264 & SH, Oswego, NY
Over: SALMON RIVER
IN ALTMAR, Oswego, NY
Over: BLACK CREEK
2 MI N JCT RT 57 & FULTON, Oswego, NY
Over: CR 12
1.5 MI SE JCT SH481&SH264, Oswego, NY
Over: SALMON RIVER
.3 MI N JCT US 11 & SH 13, Oswego, NY
Over: 481 481 34021012 RTE 48
2.4 MI SE JCT RTS 481+264, Oswego, NY
Over: LITT SANDY CREEK
3.3 MI E OF LACONA, Oswego, NY
Over: CATFISH CREEK
0.3MI NE JCT RTS 104B+104, Oswego, NY
Over: OSWEGO CANAL OSWEGO RIV
0.3 m S ST RTE 104, Oswego, NY
Over: DYKEMAN CREEK
2.9 MI N JCT RTS I81SB+49, Oswego, NY
Over: DYKEMAN CREEK
2.9 MI N JCT RTS I81NB+49, Oswego, NY
Over: 481 481 34021035 RTE 48
JCT OF RTS 481 + 264, Oswego, NY
Over: CR 12
1.5 MI SE JCT SH481&SH264, Oswego, NY
Over: CSX TRANSP0RTATION
.2 MI E JCT SH481 & CR57, Oswego, NY
Over: CSX TRANSPRTATION
0.3 m N Kim Av & N6th St, Oswego, NY
Over: ABANDONED RAILROAD
2 MILES SW OF OSWEGO, Oswego, NY
Over: STERLING VLLY CRK
1.6 MI W OF HANNIBAL, Oswego, NY
Over: LITTLE SALMON RIVER
.6 MI E JCT SH 69 & US 11, Oswego, NY
Over: Walkway Tunnel
JCT E SECOND & E ONEIDA, Oswego, NY
Over: SWAMP CREEK
6.5 MILES SW OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: CAUGHDENOY CREEK
2.8 MI SW OF CENTRAL SQ, Oswego, NY
Over: LITTLE SALMON RIVER
IN MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: LITTLE SALMON RVR
2.7 MI NW OF PARISH, Oswego, NY
Over: CSX TRANSPORTATION
0.6 MI N JCT RTS 11 & 69, Oswego, NY
Over: SCRIBA CREEK
SH 49 AT CONSTANTIA, Oswego, NY
Over: DEER CREEK
1.9 MI NE JCT SH 3 & SH13, Oswego, NY
Over: CATFISH CREEK
3.8 MI SW OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: GRINDSTONE CREEK
4 MI SW OF PULASKI, Oswego, NY
Over: SCRIBA CREEK
2.5 MI NW OF CONSTANTIA, Oswego, NY
Over: TANNERY CREEK
0.2 MI WEST OF SH 3, Oswego, NY
Over: CATFISH CREEK
4.8 MI SW OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: BLACK CREEK
5.0 MI SE OF OSWEGO, Oswego, NY
Over: CAUGHDENOY CREEK
3.2 MI W JCT RTS 49 + 11, Oswego, NY
Over: SIXMILE CREEK
2.8 MI NE OF PHOENIX, Oswego, NY
Over: SAGE CREEK
1.5 MI NE OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: LITTLE SALMON RVR
1.8 MI S JCT I81NB & SH69, Oswego, NY
Over: SAGE CREEK
2.0 MI N OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: SAGE CREEK
3.0 MI N OF MEXICO, Oswego, NY
Over: OX CREEK
3.5 MI S OF FULTON, Oswego, NY
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.