Total bridges
90
Public highway bridges in Caswell County
County profile · official public datasets
90 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 58.9% rated Good, 35.6% Fair, 5.6% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Caswell County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Caswell County ranks #57 of 100 North Carolina counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 5.6%). Caswell County, North Carolina contains 90 public highway bridges. Roughly 58.9% are rated “Good,” 35.6% “Fair,” and 5.6% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
90
Public highway bridges in Caswell County
Good condition
58.9%
53 of 90 rated 7-9
Fair condition
35.6%
32 of 90 rated 5-6
Poor condition
5.6%
5 of 90 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#57 of 100
Among North Carolina counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 90 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 19.7% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 5.6% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry more traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 3,380 crossings a day against 583 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 90 of 90 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
14 of the 90 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 58.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
NC86 over HOGANS CREEK, built 1957, carries 8,500 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 5-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 16,900 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
90 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
3 bridges
1930–1939
3 bridges
1950–1959
6 bridges
1960–1969
1 bridges
1970–1979
7 bridges
1980–1989
13 bridges
1990–1999
13 bridges
2000–2009
29 bridges
2010–2019
14 bridges
2020–2029
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2000s, when 29 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 32.2% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 15 to 24 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1991, 5 years newer than the North Carolina average of 1986.
The 5 North Carolina counties nearest Caswell County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 5.6% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1991 against a peer-group mean of 1984 is 7 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 99 North Carolina counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bertie County | 95 | 50.5% | 46.3% | 3.2% | 1993 |
| Graham County | 94 | 35.1% | 60.6% | 4.3% | 1979 |
| Davie County | 93 | 33.3% | 62.4% | 4.3% | 1982 |
| Caswell County (this page) | 90 | 58.9% | 35.6% | 5.6% | 1991 |
| Warren County | 84 | 47.6% | 47.6% | 4.8% | 1985 |
| Northampton County | 83 | 31.3% | 65.1% | 3.6% | 1981 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Caswell County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Caswell County, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside NC (90 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside NC (1991 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: COUNTRY LINE CREEK
0.7 MI. E. JCT. US158, Caswell, NC
Over: HOGANS CREEK
1.13 MI. N. JCT. SR1300, Caswell, NC
Over: COUNTRY LINE CREEK
1.2 MI. E. JCT. NC62, Caswell, NC
Over: REEDY FORK CREEK
1.0 MI. S. JCT. SR1564, Caswell, NC
Over: WOLF ISLAND CREEK
0.7 MI. E. JCT. SR1343, Caswell, NC
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.