Total bridges
129
Public highway bridges in Jasper County
County profile · official public datasets
129 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 24.8% rated Good, 75.2% Fair, 0% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Jasper County pairs a top-5% lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Jasper County ranks #1 of 46 South Carolina counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 0%). Jasper County, South Carolina contains 129 public highway bridges. Roughly 24.8% are rated “Good,” 75.2% “Fair,” and 0% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
129
Public highway bridges in Jasper County
Good condition
24.8%
32 of 129 rated 7-9
Fair condition
75.2%
97 of 129 rated 5-6
Poor condition
0%
0 of 129 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#1 of 46
Among South Carolina counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 129 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
82 of the 129 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 24.8% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
129 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
9 bridges
1930–1939
7 bridges
1940–1949
11 bridges
1950–1959
14 bridges
1960–1969
27 bridges
1970–1979
26 bridges
1980–1989
6 bridges
1990–1999
10 bridges
2000–2009
7 bridges
2010–2019
12 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 27 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 20.9% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1970, 7 years older than the South Carolina average of 1977.
The 5 South Carolina counties nearest Jasper County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 0% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1970 against a peer-group mean of 1974 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 45 South Carolina counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfield County | 139 | 36.7% | 55.4% | 7.9% | 1976 |
| Union County | 131 | 35.9% | 49.6% | 14.5% | 1975 |
| Jasper County (this page) | 129 | 24.8% | 75.2% | 0% | 1970 |
| Dillon County | 128 | 25% | 70.3% | 4.7% | 1972 |
| Saluda County | 125 | 40.8% | 52.8% | 6.4% | 1973 |
| Edgefield County | 124 | 34.7% | 62.9% | 2.4% | 1972 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Jasper County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Jasper County, both outside South Carolina so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside SC (129 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside SC (1970 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: BAGSHAW SWAMP
1.5MI S OF TILLMAN, Jasper, SC
Over: MILL STONE CREEK
10.2MI SW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: COOSAWHATCHIE RIVER
14.8MI N RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: BAHAMA SWAMP
5MI N OF HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: BEAVERDAM CREEK
11.8MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: BEAVERDAM CREEK
13.5MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: TRIB TO NEW RIVER
5.3MI SE OF HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: JESSIE CREEK
12.1 MI NE OF RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: CYPRESS CREEK
10.5 MI W RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
2.4 MI NW OF OKATIE, Jasper, SC
Over: BACK RIVER
1 MILE N OR SAVANNAH, Jasper, SC
Over: MAJOR BRANCH
4.5MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: EUHAW CREEK
5MI E OF RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: GREAT SWAMP
5.5MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
10.8MI SW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: BEES CREEK
3.5MI S OF COOSAWHATCHIE, Jasper, SC
Over: GREAT SWAMP
1.8M NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: BEAVERDAM BRANCH
10.5MI NW OF RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: BEAVER DAM CREEK
11.2MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: CYPRESS CREEK
14.6MI N RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: COLEMAN LAKE BRANCH
18.0 MI W RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: ELBO CREEK
8.7 MI NW OF RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
4.8MI NW HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: ELBO CREEK
1MI W OF GRAYS, Jasper, SC
Over: CYPRESS CREEK
14.7MI N RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: ZIGZAG BRANCH
15.5MI NW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: WAGON BRANCH
4 MI W OF RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
4 MI NE OF HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: BROAD WATER CREEK
4MI SW RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Over: MONGON SWAMP
6MI SE HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: CLYDESDALE CREEK
10 MI S HARDEEVILLE, Jasper, SC
Over: KNOWLES ISLAND
7.2MI NE RIDGELAND, Jasper, SC
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.