Total bridges
166
Public highway bridges in Sumter County
County profile · official public datasets
166 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 44% rated Good, 45.2% Fair, 10.8% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Sumter County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Sumter County ranks #40 of 46 South Carolina counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 10.8%). Sumter County, South Carolina contains 166 public highway bridges. Roughly 44% are rated “Good,” 45.2% “Fair,” and 10.8% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
166
Public highway bridges in Sumter County
Good condition
44%
73 of 166 rated 7-9
Fair condition
45.2%
75 of 166 rated 5-6
Poor condition
10.8%
18 of 166 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#40 of 46
Among South Carolina counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 166 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 14.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 10.8% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry more traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 5,976 crossings a day against 2,424 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 166 of 166 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
72 of the 166 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 44% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
I-95 over HOPE SWAMP, built 1967, carries 35,000 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 18-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 107,575 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
166 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
2 bridges
1930–1939
6 bridges
1940–1949
18 bridges
1950–1959
15 bridges
1960–1969
18 bridges
1970–1979
16 bridges
1980–1989
16 bridges
1990–1999
32 bridges
2000–2009
22 bridges
2010–2019
21 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1990s, when 32 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 19.3% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 25 to 34 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1981) matches the South Carolina average (1977).
The 5 South Carolina counties nearest Sumter County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 10.8% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1981 against a peer-group mean of 1974 is 7 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 45 South Carolina counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lancaster County | 181 | 29.3% | 58% | 12.7% | 1967 |
| Darlington County | 174 | 32.8% | 62.1% | 5.2% | 1974 |
| Kershaw County | 174 | 39.7% | 55.2% | 5.2% | 1978 |
| Clarendon County | 170 | 25.3% | 72.9% | 1.8% | 1976 |
| Sumter County (this page) | 166 | 44% | 45.2% | 10.8% | 1981 |
| Abbeville County | 163 | 41.1% | 55.8% | 3.1% | 1975 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Sumter County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Sumter County, both outside South Carolina so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside SC (166 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside SC (1981 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: COWPEN SWAMP
7 MI NE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: COWPEN SWAMP
5 MI NE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: LITTLE RAFTING CREEK
12 MI NW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: PUDDING SWAMP NO. 2
10 MI SE OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: PUDDING SWAMP N 0.1
10 MI SE OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: THREE MILE BRANCH
8 MI SE MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: RAFTING CREEK
2 MI E OF REMBERT, Sumter, SC
Over: HOPE CREEK
15 MI E OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: WATEREE RIVER SWP-1
12 MI W OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BLACK RIVER
10 MI E OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TURKEY CREEK
TOWN OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: MUSH SWAMP
4 MI NW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: SCAPE ORE CREEK
1 MI SW OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: BLACK RIVER
10 MI E OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: COWPEN SWAMP
6 MI NE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BEECH CREEK
13 MI W OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: SAMMY SWAMP
3 MI NE OF PINEWOOD, Sumter, SC
Over: NASTY BRANCH
7 MI SW SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BLACK RIVER #1
3 MI SE OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: SHOT POUCH BRANCH
TOWN OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: POCALLA CREEK
4 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BRANCH OF NASTY BRANCH
8 MI SW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TEARCOAT BRANCH
10 MI SE SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: DOUGLAS SWAMP
12 MI SE OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: POCOTALIGO RIVER
9 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TURKEY CREEK
CITY OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: GREEN SWAMP
6 MI NW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: GREEN SWAMP
5 MI NW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BR OF ROCKY BLUFF CR
8 MI N OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: SCAPE ORE CREEK (NO. 1)
7 MI NE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: ALLIGATOR BRANCH
5 MI E OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TEARCOAT BRANCH
8 MI SE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: THREE MILE BRANCH
9 MI SE MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: BLUFFHEAD BRANCH
5 MI NW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: HOPE SWAMP
7 MI SE OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: POCOTALIGO SWAMP #1
9 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: BRIAR BANCH
9 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TRIB TO NASTY BR
6 MI SW SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: MULBERRY BRANCH
3 MI NE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: DAVIS BRANCH
9 MI SE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: NASTY BRANCH
5 MI SW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: LONG BRANCH
7 MI S OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: CAMP BRANCH
5 MI E SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: NASTY BRANCH
9 MI SW OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: ROCKY BLUFF SWAMP
11 MI N OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TRIB TO PUDDING SWAMP
9 MI E OF MAYESVILLE, Sumter, SC
Over: TURKEY CREEK
2 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: TURKEY CREEK BRANCH
2 MI SE OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: U.S. 15
TOWN OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Over: POCOTALIGO RIVER
2 MI S OF SUMTER, Sumter, SC
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.