Total bridges
321
Public highway bridges in Giles County
County profile · official public datasets
321 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 56.1% rated Good, 41.7% Fair, 2.2% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Giles County pairs a top-quartile lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Giles County ranks #19 of 95 Tennessee counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 2.2%). Giles County, Tennessee contains 321 public highway bridges. Roughly 56.1% are rated “Good,” 41.7% “Fair,” and 2.2% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
321
Public highway bridges in Giles County
Good condition
56.1%
180 of 321 rated 7-9
Fair condition
41.7%
134 of 321 rated 5-6
Poor condition
2.2%
7 of 321 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#19 of 95
Among Tennessee counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 321 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.5% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 2.2% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 791 crossings a day against 3,440 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 321 of 321 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
182 of the 321 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 56.1% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
FAP 11 over PIGEON ROOST CREEK, built 1938, carries 3,828 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 7-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 5,537 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
321 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
29 bridges
1930–1939
26 bridges
1940–1949
19 bridges
1950–1959
48 bridges
1960–1969
54 bridges
1970–1979
11 bridges
1980–1989
51 bridges
1990–1999
49 bridges
2000–2009
24 bridges
2010–2019
9 bridges
2020–2029
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 54 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 16.8% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1968, 9 years older than the Tennessee average of 1977.
The 5 Tennessee counties nearest Giles County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 2.2% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1968 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is 9 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 94 Tennessee counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fayette County | 336 | 23.8% | 68.8% | 7.4% | 1984 |
| Hickman County | 331 | 38.7% | 56.2% | 5.1% | 1979 |
| Giles County (this page) | 321 | 56.1% | 41.7% | 2.2% | 1968 |
| Greene County | 306 | 30.4% | 67% | 2.6% | 1974 |
| Lincoln County | 304 | 52.6% | 44.4% | 3% | 1974 |
| Bedford County | 294 | 58.5% | 38.8% | 2.7% | 1973 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Giles County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Giles County, both outside Tennessee so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside TN (321 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside TN (1968 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: BEATY BRANCH
GRIGSBY RD IN ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
0.1 E SR 7 IN PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
SPRING ST IN PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
4 M. E. PULASKI., Giles, TN
Over: BRANCH
7 M. SW. LYNNVILLE., Giles, TN
Over: NEWMAN RD / I65
10 M SE OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: PETTY CREEK
5 M. N. PROSPECT., Giles, TN
Over: BEE SPRINGS BRANCH
5 M NE OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: BELL CREEK
7 M N OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: ELK RIVER
IN ELKTON CITY LIMITS, Giles, TN
Over: NEWTON BRANCH
3.2 MI.NW.OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: BRANCH
5.5 MI.N.OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: EAST LYNN CREEK
13.5 MI.N.OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
.6 M E OF I65, Giles, TN
Over: I65 RL/CLOCK CK-NFA A15
2.4 MI S MARSHALL CO LI, Giles, TN
Over: I65 LL/CLOCK CR-NFA A15
2.4 MI S MARSHALL CO LI, Giles, TN
Over: BRADSHAW CR & CSX RR
.8 M E OF I65, Giles, TN
Over: LITTLE BRADSHAW CREEK
.6 M E OF I65, Giles, TN
Over: CLOCK CREEK
9 M NE OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: RICHLAND CREEK
3 MI SW JCT SR7, Giles, TN
Over: N FK PIGEON ROOST CREEK
5 M NE OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: BRANCH
7.5 M N OF FRANKEWING, Giles, TN
Over: TRADE BRANCH
2 M SE OF LYNNVILLE, Giles, TN
Over: OLIVER BRANCH
5 M E OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: EAST FORK DOG BRANCH
5 M NW OF PROSPECT, Giles, TN
Over: YOKLEY CREEK
2.8 MI.N.OF CAMPBELLSVILL, Giles, TN
Over: BUCHANNAN CREEK
4.8 MI.E.OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: SHANNON CREEK
4.2 M W OF GOODSPRING, Giles, TN
Over: WEAKLEY CREEK
8.5 M. NW. PULASKI., Giles, TN
Over: I65 / BUNKER HILL RD
1.4 MI SW JCT SR15, Giles, TN
Over: JENKINS CREEK
14.6 MI. S. OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: CSX RAILROAD
7 MILES NORTH OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: SINKING CREEK
3 M S OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: INDIAN CREEK
6 M N OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: E. FORK SHANNON BRANCH
8.5 M SW OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: BROWNLOW CREEK
2.2 MI.NW.OF CAMPBELLSVIL, Giles, TN
Over: BEATY BRANCH
IN ELKTON CITY LIMITS, Giles, TN
Over: OVERFLOW
4.9 MI.NW.OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: BRADSHAW CR & CSX RR
.8 M E OF I65, Giles, TN
Over: I65 RL/DIANA RD NFA 1889
1 MI S MARSHALL CO LI, Giles, TN
Over: RICHLAND CREEK
7.5 M S OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: ELK RIVER
2 M S OF PROSPECT, Giles, TN
Over: SHOAL CREEK
7 MI NE ALA-TN ST LI, Giles, TN
Over: CHOATE CREEK
8.5 M W OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: HULSEY BRANCH
3 M S OF MINOR HILL, Giles, TN
Over: E. FORK SHOALS CREEK
5 M NW OF PROSPECT, Giles, TN
Over: RICHLAND CREEK
9 M NE OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: PIGEON ROOST CREEK
4 M NE OF PULASKI, Giles, TN
Over: REEVES BRANCH
.5 M NE OF ELKTON, Giles, TN
Over: WEST FORK OF SHOAL CREEK
3.5 M SE OF MINOR HILL, Giles, TN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.