FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

US220N.RAMP

Carrying US220N.RAMP over US220 RAMP

1.2 MI. W. JCT. SR1007, Guilford, North Carolina

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: US220N.RAMP

The US220N.RAMP bridge in Guilford, North Carolina carries US220N.RAMP over US220 RAMP. It was built in 1995, making it 31 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel. Daily traffic averages 9,000 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of North Carolina bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How US220N.RAMP compares

736
Bridges in Guilford · 22 in Poor condition

Live comparison across North Carolina.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
98.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
28.0
Essentiality /15
15.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1995
Material
Steel
Avg Daily Traffic
9,000 vehicles/day
Structure Number
000000000810683

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether US220N.RAMP is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare US220N.RAMP against other structures in Guilford and across North Carolina. North Carolina bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for US220N.RAMP?

US220N.RAMP in Guilford, North Carolina on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is US220N.RAMP inspected?

US220N.RAMP's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 9,000 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. US220N.RAMP is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for US220N.RAMP?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for US220N.RAMP.

Who is responsible for maintaining US220N.RAMP?

Ownership is not specified for US220N.RAMP in the NBI.

How old is US220N.RAMP and does age affect safety?

US220N.RAMP was built in 1995, making it 31 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.