FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

STONE CHURCH RD

Carrying STONE CHURCH RD over 90IX, RTE I90

2.0 MI W EXIT 41 I90, Seneca, New York

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: STONE CHURCH RD

The STONE CHURCH RD bridge in Seneca, New York carries STONE CHURCH RD over 90IX, RTE I90. It was built in 1953, making it 73 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Average daily traffic is not reported for this structure.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. No reported major component scores in the Poor range under the current federal condition thresholds.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How STONE CHURCH RD compares

64
Bridges in Seneca · 14 in Poor condition

Live comparison across New York.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
95.9 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
26.0
Essentiality /15
14.9
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1953
Material
Steel Continuous
Structure Number
000000005510460

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether STONE CHURCH RD is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare STONE CHURCH RD against other structures in Seneca and across New York. New York bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for STONE CHURCH RD?

STONE CHURCH RD in Seneca, New York on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is STONE CHURCH RD inspected?

STONE CHURCH RD's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. STONE CHURCH RD is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for STONE CHURCH RD?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for STONE CHURCH RD.

Who is responsible for maintaining STONE CHURCH RD?

Ownership is not specified for STONE CHURCH RD in the NBI.

How old is STONE CHURCH RD and does age affect safety?

STONE CHURCH RD was built in 1953, making it 73 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.