FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

ROUTE 171

Carrying ROUTE 171 over INTERSTATE-84

0.5 MI FR MASS STATE LINE, Tolland, Connecticut

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: ROUTE 171

The ROUTE 171 bridge in Tolland, Connecticut carries ROUTE 171 over INTERSTATE-84. It was built in 1954, making it 72 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel. Daily traffic averages 50,700 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Connecticut bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How ROUTE 171 compares

188
Bridges in Tolland · 15 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Connecticut.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
82.4 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
45.0
Serviceability /30
25.4
Essentiality /15
14.0
Special reductions
−2.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1954
Material
Steel
Avg Daily Traffic
50,700 vehicles/day
Structure Number
00850

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether ROUTE 171 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare ROUTE 171 against other structures in Tolland and across Connecticut. Connecticut bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for ROUTE 171?

ROUTE 171 in Tolland, Connecticut on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is ROUTE 171 inspected?

ROUTE 171's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 50,700 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. ROUTE 171 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for ROUTE 171?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for ROUTE 171.

Who is responsible for maintaining ROUTE 171?

Ownership is not specified for ROUTE 171 in the NBI.

How old is ROUTE 171 and does age affect safety?

ROUTE 171 was built in 1954, making it 72 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.