FHWA NBI 2026 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

FAU 24

Carrying FAU 24 over OBED RIVER

IN CROSSVILLE CITY LIMITS, Cumberland, Tennessee

FHWA NBI inspection record for this structure. Condition ratings, inventory load rating, span, deck width, and average daily traffic refresh annually with each NBI release.

Poor
22 t Inventory load rating

Bridge Snapshot: FAU 24

The FAU 24 bridge in Cumberland, Tennessee carries FAU 24 over OBED RIVER. It was built in 1929, making it 97 years old today. It was last reconstructed in 1954, extending its service life. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 4 sections, stretching 45.7 meters (150 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 7,324 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Tennessee bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency, the entity responsible for routine inspections and any needed repairs.

The latest FHWA inspection records show a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure at 4/9, substructure at 5/9 on the 0–9 NBI scale, where 9 is excellent and 0 is failed. The weakest component sits in poor condition, which drives the overall status of this bridge. Because at least one major component scores 4 or lower, the FHWA classifies this bridge as structurally deficient — a maintenance flag, not a closure order. Its NBI inventory load rating is 21.7 metric tons — the load level the structure is rated to carry at inventory (long-term) level.

In a county that maintains hundreds of NBI-tracked bridges, FAU 24 is one data point in a Tennessee inventory that FHWA inspects on a two-year cycle (more often when ratings fall). Bridge age alone is not a reliable safety signal — a 97-era structure can outperform a newer one when maintenance is consistent, materials are sound, and traffic loads stay within design limits. Use the condition ratings above, the sufficiency score, and the structurally-deficient flag together to read the bridge's real status, and check the linked county and state pages to see how this bridge ranks against its peers.

Every figure on this page comes directly from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory (NBI), the public dataset that catalogs more than 617,000 highway bridges across the United States and is updated annually from the records that each state Department of Transportation submits to the FHWA. The condition codes use the standardized FHWA Recording and Coding Guide, the same scale that determines federal eligibility for the Highway Bridge Program and the Surface Transportation Block Grant set-aside for off-system bridges. A "structurally deficient" classification under those federal criteria is a maintenance and funding flag, never a closure order; states keep deficient bridges open with load posting, weight limits, or accelerated inspection cycles until rehabilitation or replacement is funded. See our methodology for refresh cadence and the exact NBI release vintage powering each record.

How FAU 24 compares

▼ 7.8
Load rating vs Tennessee average (29.5 t)
Bottom 9%
Lower load rating than 91% of Tennessee bridges
137
Bridges in Cumberland · 22 structurally deficient
FAU 24 21.7 t
Tennessee average 29.5 t

NBI inventory load rating (metric tons) and structural-deficiency status compared across Tennessee, computed live from the FHWA NBI.

Condition Ratings

Deck
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Superstructure
4/9
Poor (1–4)
Substructure
5/9
Fair (5–6)
Inventory Load Rating
21.7 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
SD Status
Structurally Deficient

Ratings are on a 0–9 scale: 9 = Excellent, 7–8 = Good, 5–6 = Fair, 3–4 = Poor, 0–2 = Critical/Failed. Sufficiency rating (0–100) combines structural adequacy, functional obsolescence, and essentiality.

Structural Details

Year Built
1929
Last Reconstructed
1954
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
4
Structure Length
45.7 m (150 ft)
Deck Width
10.5 m (34 ft)
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
7,324 vehicles/day
Structure Number
18SR0240003

Location

IN CROSSVILLE CITY LIMITS, Cumberland, Tennessee
35.974517, -85.048531
View on Google Maps ↗

Data Source

Data from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI). Bridge inspections are required every two years by federal law. Conditions reflect the most recent inspection.

FHWA NBI Program ↗

Condition Analysis

Built in 1929, this bridge is 97 years old and was last reconstructed in 1954. It carries approximately 7,324 vehicles per day. Based on the most recent FHWA inspection:

  • The deck (driving surface) is in fair condition (5/9), with minor deterioration that may require routine maintenance.
  • The superstructure (beams and supports above the deck) is in poor condition (4/9), showing advanced deterioration that may require priority repair.
  • The substructure (piers and abutments) is in fair condition (5/9), with minor deterioration that may require routine maintenance.

Its NBI inventory load rating reflects the load level it is rated to carry. This bridge is classified as structurally deficient, meaning at least one major component is rated in poor condition. This does not mean the bridge is unsafe — it means it requires repair or monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for FAU 24?

Bridge condition ratings use a 0–9 scale set by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Ratings 7–9 indicate good condition with no significant problems. Ratings 5–6 mean fair condition with minor issues. Ratings 3–4 indicate poor condition requiring repair. Ratings 0–2 are critical, meaning the bridge has serious structural problems. FAU 24 in Cumberland, Tennessee has a deck rating of 5/9, superstructure rating of 4/9, and substructure rating of 5/9.

How often is FAU 24 inspected?

Federal law requires most highway bridges to be inspected at least every 24 months. Bridges in poor condition or with known issues may be inspected more frequently (every 12 months or less). FAU 24 is part of the National Bridge Inventory maintained by the FHWA. With 7,324 vehicles crossing daily, regular inspection is essential.

What does "structurally deficient" mean for a bridge?

A structurally deficient bridge has at least one major component (deck, superstructure, or substructure) rated 4 or below on the FHWA 0–9 scale. This classification does NOT mean the bridge is unsafe for travel — it means the bridge needs repair, rehabilitation, or eventual replacement. Structurally deficient bridges remain open and are monitored. FAU 24 is currently classified as structurally deficient.

What is the inventory load rating for FAU 24?

The NBI inventory rating is the load level a bridge is rated to carry for an indefinite period, recorded in metric tons. A lower number means the structure is more load-restricted. FAU 24 has an inventory load rating of 21.7 metric tons. It is distinct from the FHWA sufficiency rating, a separate 0–100 funding-eligibility score that this dataset does not include.

Who is responsible for maintaining FAU 24?

Bridge ownership and maintenance responsibility varies — bridges may be owned by state DOTs, counties, cities, railroads, or federal agencies. FAU 24 is maintained by State Highway Agency. The FHWA oversees the National Bridge Inventory program and sets inspection standards, but day-to-day maintenance falls to the owning agency. If you notice damage or safety concerns, contact your state DOT or call 911 for emergencies.

How old is FAU 24 and does age affect safety?

FAU 24 was built in 1929, making it 97 years old. Bridge age alone does not determine safety — condition depends on materials, design, traffic load, maintenance history, and environmental exposure. Many older bridges remain in good condition due to regular maintenance and reconstruction. This bridge was last reconstructed in 1954.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A structurally deficient rating does not mean a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel — it indicates the bridge requires repair or replacement. For current closure or safety information, contact your state DOT.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges Editorial