E0420 (CHESTNUT ST
Carrying E0420 (CHESTNUT ST over CREEK
0.1 MI E OF OAKWOOD, Garfield, Oklahoma
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: E0420 (CHESTNUT ST
The E0420 (CHESTNUT ST bridge in Garfield, Oklahoma carries E0420 (CHESTNUT ST over CREEK. It was built in 1984, making it 42 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 4 sections, stretching 18.1 meters (59 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 4,800 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Oklahoma bridges. It is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 3/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. At least one major component here scores 4 or below, which produces a Poor condition classification under FHWA's current reporting rules. Its NBI inventory load rating is 22.5 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How E0420 (CHESTNUT ST compares
Live comparison across Oklahoma.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1984
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 4
- Structure Length
- 18.1 m (59 ft)
- Deck Width
- 10.2 m (33 ft)
- Owner
- City/Municipal Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 4,800 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 207010000000000
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
- Compare E0420 (CHESTNUT ST against other structures in Garfield and across Oklahoma. Oklahoma bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for E0420 (CHESTNUT ST?
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST in Garfield, Oklahoma on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is E0420 (CHESTNUT ST inspected?
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 4,800 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. E0420 (CHESTNUT ST is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for E0420 (CHESTNUT ST?
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST has an NBI inventory load rating of 22.5 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining E0420 (CHESTNUT ST?
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST is owned and maintained by City/Municipal Highway Agency.
How old is E0420 (CHESTNUT ST and does age affect safety?
E0420 (CHESTNUT ST was built in 1984, making it 42 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.