FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

RP FROM SR 153

Carrying RP FROM SR 153 over RP FROM SR 153

SR-153 JCT., Hamilton, Tennessee

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: RP FROM SR 153

The RP FROM SR 153 bridge in Hamilton, Tennessee carries RP FROM SR 153 over RP FROM SR 153. It was built in 2000, making it 26 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 110,093 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Tennessee bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. None of this bridge's reported major components fall into the Poor condition range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How RP FROM SR 153 compares

464
Bridges in Hamilton · 23 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Tennessee.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
83.0 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
55.0
Serviceability /30
28.0
Essentiality /15
0.0
Special reductions
0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
2000
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
110,093 vehicles/day
Structure Number
33I00750039

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether RP FROM SR 153 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare RP FROM SR 153 against other structures in Hamilton and across Tennessee. Tennessee bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for RP FROM SR 153?

RP FROM SR 153 in Hamilton, Tennessee on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is RP FROM SR 153 inspected?

RP FROM SR 153's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 110,093 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. RP FROM SR 153 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for RP FROM SR 153?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for RP FROM SR 153.

Who is responsible for maintaining RP FROM SR 153?

Ownership is not specified for RP FROM SR 153 in the NBI.

How old is RP FROM SR 153 and does age affect safety?

RP FROM SR 153 was built in 2000, making it 26 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.