FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

NFA C860

Carrying NFA C860 over SAM RIDLEY PKWY LL / I24

IN SMYRNA CITY LIMITS, Rutherford, Tennessee

Data updated May 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Unknown

Bridge Snapshot: NFA C860

The NFA C860 bridge in Rutherford, Tennessee carries NFA C860 over SAM RIDLEY PKWY LL / I24. It was built in 1976, making it 50 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel continuous. Daily traffic averages 136,433 vehicles, placing it in the heavily-trafficked tier of Tennessee bridges.

The latest FHWA inspection records show limited component ratings on file. The weakest component sits in unrated condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.

How NFA C860 compares

428
Bridges in Rutherford · 18 in Poor condition

Live comparison across Tennessee.

Historical Sufficiency Rating

PlainBridge-computed
94.7 / 100 - historical 80–100 band
Structural adequacy /55
54.2
Serviceability /30
29.0
Essentiality /15
13.5
Special reductions
−2.0

FHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.

Condition Ratings

Overall Condition
Unrated

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Structural Details

Year Built
1976
Material
Steel Continuous
Avg Daily Traffic
136,433 vehicles/day
Structure Number
75I00240056

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether NFA C860 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare NFA C860 against other structures in Rutherford and across Tennessee. Tennessee bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for NFA C860?

NFA C860 in Rutherford, Tennessee on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is NFA C860 inspected?

NFA C860's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 136,433 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. NFA C860 is currently shown as unrated condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for NFA C860?

An inventory load rating is not recorded for NFA C860.

Who is responsible for maintaining NFA C860?

Ownership is not specified for NFA C860 in the NBI.

How old is NFA C860 and does age affect safety?

NFA C860 was built in 1976, making it 50 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.