IRR:NOME-COUNCIL
Carrying IRR:NOME-COUNCIL over SHOVEL CREEK
MILE POINT 37.2, Nome, Alaska
Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL in Nome, Alaska sits above 97% of rated Alaska bridges on inventory load rating (100 t), while its 1991 build year is earlier than 17% of Nome's recorded-year cohort (30 bridges).
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL in Nome, Alaska is rated Good in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1991, it carries 1 rated component on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 7. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Good result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.
NBI record plate
Structure AK:4023
LATE-CENTURY · STEEL · MULTI-SPAN · CULVERT-LED · LOCAL-ADT · HEAVY-LOAD · CAT-GOOD
- LATE-CENTURY 1980–1999
- STEEL Steel
- MULTI-SPAN 2 spans
- CULVERT-LED Culvert-led
- LOCAL-ADT Local ADT
- HEAVY-LOAD Heavy load
- CAT-GOOD Good
Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.
Bridge Snapshot: IRR:NOME-COUNCIL
The IRR:NOME-COUNCIL bridge in Nome, Alaska carries IRR:NOME-COUNCIL over SHOVEL CREEK. It was built in 1991, making it 35 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel and spans 2 sections, stretching 9.1 meters (30 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 160 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Alaska bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.
How IRR:NOME-COUNCIL compares
Age against the county: built in 1991, earlier than 5 of Nome's 30 bridges with a recorded construction year (17%), against a county median build year of 1977. This is one of the newer structures in its county.
Live comparison across Alaska bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (1,679 of 1,685 rated).
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL vs every rated Alaska bridge
Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state
100 Top 3% higher than 97% of 1,679 bridges
rated Alaska bridges, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Nome inventory by recorded NBI category
Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 30 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 1991
- Material
- Steel
- Number of Spans
- 2
- Structure Length
- 9.1 m (30 ft) 0
- Owner
- State Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 160 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 4023
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether IRR:NOME-COUNCIL is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare IRR:NOME-COUNCIL against other structures in Nome and across Alaska. Alaska bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for IRR:NOME-COUNCIL?
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL in Nome, Alaska on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is IRR:NOME-COUNCIL inspected?
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 160 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. IRR:NOME-COUNCIL is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for IRR:NOME-COUNCIL?
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL has an NBI inventory load rating of 99.9 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining IRR:NOME-COUNCIL?
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.
How old is IRR:NOME-COUNCIL and does age affect safety?
IRR:NOME-COUNCIL was built in 1991, making it 35 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Share this inspection record
Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.