FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

FAS 135

Carrying FAS 135 over E.PRONG BLACKBURN FORK C

2.3 MI.N.OF COOKEVILLE, Putnam, Tennessee

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Good
32 t Inventory load rating Lower than 61% of rated Tennessee bridges

FAS 135 in Putnam, Tennessee sits above 39% of rated Tennessee bridges on inventory load rating (32 t), while its 2003 build year is earlier than 8% of Putnam's recorded-year cohort (167 bridges).

FAS 135 in Putnam, Tennessee is rated Good in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 2003, it carries 1 rated component on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 7. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Good result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure TN:71SR1350001

POST-2000 · CONCRETE · MULTI-SPAN · CULVERT-LED · ARTERIAL-ADT · STANDARD-LOAD · CAT-GOOD

  • POST-2000 2000+
  • CONCRETE Concrete
  • MULTI-SPAN 3 spans
  • CULVERT-LED Culvert-led
  • ARTERIAL-ADT Arterial ADT
  • STANDARD-LOAD Standard load
  • CAT-GOOD Good

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: FAS 135

The FAS 135 bridge in Putnam, Tennessee carries FAS 135 over E.PRONG BLACKBURN FORK C. It was built in 2003, making it 23 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 3 sections, stretching 15.0 meters (49 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 4,404 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Tennessee bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range.

How FAS 135 compares

▲ 2.9
Load rating vs Tennessee average (29.5 t; 20,355 of 20,379 rated)
167
Bridges in Putnam · 4 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 2003, earlier than 14 of Putnam's 167 bridges with a recorded construction year (8%), against a county median build year of 1980. This is one of the newer structures in its county.

FAS 135 32.4 t
Tennessee average (20,355 of 20,379 rated) 29.5 t

Live comparison across Tennessee bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (20,355 of 20,379 rated).

FAS 135 vs every rated Tennessee bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

32 Top 61% higher than 39% of 20,355 bridges

rated Tennessee bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Culvert
7/9
Good (7–9)
Inventory Load Rating
32.4 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Good

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Putnam inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 167 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
2003
Material
Concrete
Number of Spans
3
Structure Length
15.0 m (49 ft)
0
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
4,404 vehicles/day
Structure Number
71SR1350001

How to read this record

This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether FAS 135 is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
  • Compare FAS 135 against other structures in Putnam and across Tennessee. Tennessee bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for FAS 135?

FAS 135 in Putnam, Tennessee on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is FAS 135 inspected?

FAS 135's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 4,404 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. FAS 135 is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for FAS 135?

FAS 135 has an NBI inventory load rating of 32.4 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining FAS 135?

FAS 135 is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

How old is FAS 135 and does age affect safety?

FAS 135 was built in 2003, making it 23 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.