FHWA NBI 2024 Inspection record Public-domain dataset

FAP 96

Carrying FAP 96 over BRANCH

3.7 M E JCT SR96&SR102, Rutherford, Tennessee

Inventory: FHWA NBI 2024 · last ETL August 2026

FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.

Poor
90 t Inventory load rating Higher than 99% of rated Tennessee bridges

FAP 96 in Rutherford, Tennessee sits above 99% of rated Tennessee bridges on inventory load rating (90 t), while its 1960 build year is earlier than 78% of Rutherford's recorded-year cohort (428 bridges).

FAP 96 in Rutherford, Tennessee is rated Poor in the FHWA's 2024 National Bridge Inventory. Built in 1960, it carries 1 rated component on the inspecting agency's 0-9 scale, and its weakest reported component scores 4. The lowest applicable rating sets the federal condition category, so this Poor result describes the weakest reported component rather than the structure as a whole. No NBI category is a closure decision or a live crossing-safety verdict.

NBI record plate

Structure TN:75SR0960009

INTERSTATE-ERA · STEEL · LONG-SPAN-RUN · CULVERT-LED · ARTERIAL-ADT · HEAVY-LOAD · CAT-POOR

  • INTERSTATE-ERA 1950–1979
  • STEEL Steel
  • LONG-SPAN-RUN 4 spans
  • CULVERT-LED Culvert-led
  • ARTERIAL-ADT Arterial ADT
  • HEAVY-LOAD Heavy load
  • CAT-POOR Poor

Inspection-sheet codes from this record’s year, material family, spans, controlling component, ADT, inventory load, and NBI category, not a live closure verdict.

Bridge Snapshot: FAP 96

The FAP 96 bridge in Rutherford, Tennessee carries FAP 96 over BRANCH. It was built in 1960, making it 66 years old today. The structure is built primarily of steel and spans 4 sections, stretching 9.8 meters (32 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 4,999 vehicles, placing it in the moderately-trafficked tier of Tennessee bridges. It is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 4/9. The weakest component sits in poor condition. A component scored 4 or below, placing this bridge in the federal Poor condition category rather than declaring it unsafe or closed.

How FAP 96 compares

▲ 60.6
Load rating vs Tennessee average (29.5 t; 20,355 of 20,379 rated)
428
Bridges in Rutherford · 18 in Poor condition

Age against the county: built in 1960, earlier than 335 of Rutherford's 428 bridges with a recorded construction year (78%), against a county median build year of 1980. Age is not a defect on its own, but it is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn.

FAP 96 90.1 t
Tennessee average (20,355 of 20,379 rated) 29.5 t

Live comparison across Tennessee bridges with a recorded inventory load rating (20,355 of 20,379 rated).

FAP 96 vs every rated Tennessee bridge

Inventory load rating (metric tons), FHWA NBI, this state

90 Top 1% higher than 99% of 20,355 bridges

rated Tennessee bridges, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more bridges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FHWA National Bridge Inventory · August 2026

Condition Ratings

Culvert
4/9
Poor (1–4)
Inventory Load Rating
90.1 t
NBI inventory level (metric tons)
Overall Condition
Poor

Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.

Rutherford inventory by recorded NBI category

Exclusive Good/Fair/Poor bands across all 428 bridges in this county. Orthogonal to this structure's component profile above: a county catalog share, not a live crossing-safety verdict.

Structural Details

Year Built
1960
Material
Steel
Number of Spans
4
Structure Length
9.8 m (32 ft)
Deck Width
7.3 m (24 ft)
Owner
State Highway Agency
Avg Daily Traffic
4,999 vehicles/day
Structure Number
75SR0960009

How to read this record

FAP 96 is in the federal Poor condition category. That is a component-based result, not a closure order.

  • NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
  • Understand what Poor condition does and does not mean before drawing conclusions. Poor condition explained
  • Compare FAP 96 against other structures in Rutherford and across Tennessee. Tennessee bridges
  • Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge

Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the condition ratings mean for FAP 96?

FAP 96 in Rutherford, Tennessee on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.

How often is FAP 96 inspected?

FAP 96's responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 4,999 vehicles per day.

What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?

FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. FAP 96 is currently shown as Poor condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.

What is the inventory load rating for FAP 96?

FAP 96 has an NBI inventory load rating of 90.1 metric tons.

Who is responsible for maintaining FAP 96?

FAP 96 is owned and maintained by State Highway Agency.

How old is FAP 96 and does age affect safety?

FAP 96 was built in 1960, making it 66 years old.

Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.

Data sourced from the Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges

Share this inspection record

Send this source-bounded record or download its data card. An NBI condition category is not a closure or live crossing-safety verdict.

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Component ratings, ADT, and condition category on this page are copied from the NBI record for this structure; no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2024 NBI release. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.