Total bridges
200
Public highway bridges in Escambia County
County profile · official public datasets
200 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 21.5% rated Good, 77% Fair, 1.5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Escambia County posts a better-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Escambia County ranks #21 of 67 Alabama counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 1.5%). Escambia County, Alabama contains 200 public highway bridges. Roughly 21.5% are rated “Good,” 77% “Fair,” and 1.5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
200
Public highway bridges in Escambia County
Good condition
21.5%
43 of 200 rated 7-9
Fair condition
77%
154 of 200 rated 5-6
Poor condition
1.5%
3 of 200 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#21 of 67
Among Alabama counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 200 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 1.5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 65 crossings a day against 1,252 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 200 of 200 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
115 of the 198 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 21.5% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
MILLER CREEK BRIDG over MILLER CREEK, built 1964, carries 100 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 3-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 195 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
198 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
4 bridges
1930–1939
5 bridges
1940–1949
12 bridges
1950–1959
21 bridges
1960–1969
59 bridges
1970–1979
17 bridges
1980–1989
24 bridges
1990–1999
18 bridges
2000–2009
29 bridges
2010–2019
8 bridges
2020–2029
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 59 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 29.8% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1973) matches the Alabama average (1974).
The 5 Alabama counties nearest Escambia County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 1.5% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1973 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 66 Alabama counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geneva County | 205 | 34.6% | 62% | 3.4% | 1976 |
| Russell County | 205 | 34.6% | 62.4% | 2.9% | 1974 |
| Greene County | 204 | 45.1% | 52% | 2.9% | 1973 |
| Marengo County | 203 | 61.1% | 33% | 5.9% | 1984 |
| Elmore County | 202 | 29.2% | 67.8% | 3% | 1980 |
| Escambia County (this page) | 200 | 21.5% | 77% | 1.5% | 1973 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Escambia County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Escambia County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside AL (200 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside AL (1973 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: BIG ESCAMBIA CK BRANCH
.2 MI N CANAAN CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: SILAS MILL CREEK E PRONG
1.5MI S ELAM CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: RAILROAD BRANCH
1MI E FLOMATON, Escambia, AL
Over: MILL CREEK
1.5MI NW APPLETON, Escambia, AL
Over: HALL CREEK
1.3 MI. S PINEVIEW, Escambia, AL
Over: PERDIDO CREEK
3MI W FREEMANVILLE, Escambia, AL
Over: POLEY CREEK
3MI W DIXIE, Escambia, AL
Over: Unamed Branch
.4 MI. W OF CR. 55, Escambia, AL
Over: CONECUH RIVER RELIEF
3MI WNW DIXIE, Escambia, AL
Over: NARROW GAP CREEK
3MI SW WALLACE, Escambia, AL
Over: BROKEN LEG CREEK
.6 MI S CANAAN CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: SMITH CREEK
1.5MI NE DAMASCUS, Escambia, AL
Over: WETWEATHER CREEK
2.5MI S HUXFORD, Escambia, AL
Over: SIZEMORE CREEK
1.5 MI N ROBINSONVILLE, Escambia, AL
Over: HALL CREEK
1MI W PINEVIEW, Escambia, AL
Over: MENDENHALL CREEK
3MI NE ELAM CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: MONROE CREEK
1MI SW 1ST MARIETTA CH, Escambia, AL
Over: CONECUH RIVER RELIEF
3MI W DIXIE, Escambia, AL
Over: INDIAN BRANCH
1 MI S OSAKA, Escambia, AL
Over: BRUSHY CREEK
2MI SE NOKOMIS, Escambia, AL
Over: BELL CREEK
1.5 MI N POARCH, Escambia, AL
Over: MILL CREEK
1.5MI NNW APPLETON, Escambia, AL
Over: DIXON BRANCH
1MI ESE TRAVIS, Escambia, AL
Over: NARROW GAP CREEK
.5 MI W FOSHEE, Escambia, AL
Over: AMOS MILL CREEK
4MI NE FISHPOND, Escambia, AL
Over: SMITH CREEK
1MI W ST JAMES CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: LITTLE ESCAMBIA CREEK
.2MI E WALLACE, Escambia, AL
Over: BLACKWATER CREEK
1MI E BRADLEY, Escambia, AL
Over: BURNT CORN CREEK
1.5 MI W APPLETON, Escambia, AL
Over: LITTLE ESCAMBIA CREEK
3 MI WNW POLLARD, Escambia, AL
Over: DEAN CREEK
.2MI E WALLACE, Escambia, AL
Over: SMITH CREEK
2MI N DAMASCUS, Escambia, AL
Over: BLACKWATER CREEK
1MI ESE BRADLEY, Escambia, AL
Over: HOG BRANCH
.5 MI W MARTINVILLE, Escambia, AL
Over: SILAS MILL CREEK
6.5MI E BREWTON, Escambia, AL
Over: WILDFORK CREEK
1MI E FOSHEE, Escambia, AL
Over: BURNT CORN CREEK
2 MI N US 31, Escambia, AL
Over: BRUSHY CREEK
0.9 MI N CO RD 1, Escambia, AL
Over: HALL CREEK
2MI NW OSAKA, Escambia, AL
Over: COWPEN CREEK
2MI N SARDIS CHURCH, Escambia, AL
Over: BURNT CORN CREEK
1.5 MI W APPLETON, Escambia, AL
Over: DIXON MILL CREEK
1MI ENE TRAVIS, Escambia, AL
Over: LITTLE RIVER
4.5MI NW BOONEVILLE CH, Escambia, AL
Over: BURNT CORN CREEK
1.5MI E N.BREWTON, Escambia, AL
Over: MURDER CREEK
0.3 MI E ST JOSEPH ST, Escambia, AL
Over: KING'S BRANCH
0.2 M N OF DOUGLAS LANE, Escambia, AL
Over: Rocky Branch
1.36 Mi N of Nokomis Rd, Escambia, AL
Over: LITTLE ESCAMBIA CREEK
1.8 MI S SR 41, Escambia, AL
Over: CHAVERS CREEK
2MI NW MCCALL SCHOOL, Escambia, AL
Over: AL RR
2.2 MI N US 29, Escambia, AL
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.