Total bridges
247
Public highway bridges in Houston County
County profile · official public datasets
247 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 47.4% rated Good, 52.2% Fair, 0.4% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Houston County posts a top-10% lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Houston County ranks #5 of 67 Alabama counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 0.4%). Houston County, Alabama contains 247 public highway bridges. Roughly 47.4% are rated “Good,” 52.2% “Fair,” and 0.4% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
247
Public highway bridges in Houston County
Good condition
47.4%
117 of 247 rated 7-9
Fair condition
52.2%
129 of 247 rated 5-6
Poor condition
0.4%
1 of 247 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#5 of 67
Among Alabama counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 247 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 0.4% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 95 crossings a day against 2,251 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 247 of 247 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
110 of the 247 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 47.4% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
WILLIE RALEY RD over BEAVER CREEK, built 1990, carries 95 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 1-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 95 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
247 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
9 bridges
1930–1939
1 bridges
1940–1949
5 bridges
1950–1959
37 bridges
1960–1969
41 bridges
1970–1979
30 bridges
1980–1989
39 bridges
1990–1999
37 bridges
2000–2009
42 bridges
2010–2019
6 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2000s, when 42 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 17% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 15 to 24 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1978) matches the Alabama average (1974).
The 5 Alabama counties nearest Houston County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 0.4% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1978 against a peer-group mean of 1971 is 7 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 66 Alabama counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion County | 255 | 38.4% | 60.8% | 0.8% | 1974 |
| Houston County (this page) | 247 | 47.4% | 52.2% | 0.4% | 1978 |
| Cullman County | 246 | 29.3% | 64.6% | 6.1% | 1970 |
| Talladega County | 243 | 44.9% | 51.9% | 3.3% | 1967 |
| Sumter County | 241 | 48.5% | 46.1% | 5.4% | 1969 |
| Etowah County | 236 | 50.4% | 47.5% | 2.1% | 1976 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Houston County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Houston County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside AL (247 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside AL (1978 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: CEDAR CREEK
US84 TO COUNTYRD.75, Houston, AL
Over: BRYANS CREEK
FLA. LINE TO CO. RD. 8, Houston, AL
Over: CEDAR CREEK
ED TOLAR TO BRUNER POND, Houston, AL
Over: BEAVER CREEK
.25 MI.S FLOWERS CHPL RD, Houston, AL
Over: WEBB CREEK
CO RD 33 TO SILCOX RD, Houston, AL
Over: LITTLE CHOCTAWHATCHEE
DOTHAN, Houston, AL
Over: STREAM
DOTHAN, Houston, AL
Over: COWARTS CREEK
US 84 TO CO RD 26, Houston, AL
Over: BOGGY CREEK
AL 53 TO CO RD 81, Houston, AL
Over: OMUSSE CREEK
CIRCLE TO CO RD 55, Houston, AL
Over: WEBB CREEK
US 84 TO CO RD 26, Houston, AL
Over: CRAWFORD CREEK
COWARTS TO 431 NORTH, Houston, AL
Over: ROCKY CREEK
55 TO 95, Houston, AL
Over: DOUBLE BRIDGES CREEK
CO RD 37 TO US 231, Houston, AL
Over: GUM SLOUGH BRANCH
4.9 MI. N. FLA. LINE, Houston, AL
Over: WILSON CREEK
CO RD 38 TO CO RD 42, Houston, AL
Over: WEBB CREEK
US 84 TO CO RD 4, Houston, AL
Over: 0MUSSEE CREEK
HENRY CO LINE TO AL 52, Houston, AL
Over: PANTHER CREEK
JUDGE LOGUE RD., Houston, AL
Over: BRYANS CREEK
CO RD 8 TO CO RD 95, Houston, AL
Over: COOPER CREEK
WILSON MILL TO CO RD 55, Houston, AL
Over: SKIPPER BRANCH
SOUTH PARK TO ALA 109, Houston, AL
Over: CEDAR SPRINGS BRANCH
CO RD 26 TO CO RD 54, Houston, AL
Over: OMUSEE CREEK
AL 52 TO THE CIRCLE, Houston, AL
Over: PANTHER CREEK
US 84 TO GENEVA CO, Houston, AL
Over: NEWTON CREEK
CO RD 49 TO CO RD 59, Houston, AL
Over: OMUSSE CREEK
CIRCLE TO CO RD 55, Houston, AL
Over: BIG CREEK
CIRCLE TO GENEVA CO, Houston, AL
Over: WATFORD BRANCH
US 109 TO US 231, Houston, AL
Over: MILL CREEK
EAST OF BEN IVEY RD., Houston, AL
Over: HURRICANE CREEK
CO. RD. 63 TO CO. RD. 55, Houston, AL
Over: HURRICANE CREEK
AL 52 TO CO RD 48, Houston, AL
Over: COWARTS CREEK
US 84 TO COTTONWOOD, Houston, AL
Over: COWARTS CREEK
US 84 TO COTTONWOOD, Houston, AL
Over: OMUSSEE CREEK
COWARTS TO US 431, Houston, AL
Over: BRANCH
1 MI. E. SR.210, Houston, AL
Over: COWARTS CREEK
US 84 TO COTTONWOOD, Houston, AL
Over: POPLAR SPRING BRANCH
ALA 52 TO CIRCLE, Houston, AL
Over: COWARTS CREEK
APPR .19 M EAST OF CR 65, Houston, AL
Over: CEDAR SPRINGS CREEK
HWY 52/E TO EBENEEZER RD., Houston, AL
Over: BRANCH
4 MI. S. SR 52, Houston, AL
Over: LITTLE CHOCTAWHATCHEE RV
2 MI N.JCT US 84, Houston, AL
Over: BRANCH
3.2 MI.N.US 84, Houston, AL
Over: beaver creek
0.9 mi. s. us 84 w, Houston, AL
Over: HOWARD BRANCH
FLA LINE TO ALA 53, Houston, AL
Over: BRANCH
4.3 MI. N. FLA. LINE, Houston, AL
Over: WOFFORD CREEK
CO RD 81 TO STATE RD 84, Houston, AL
Over: OMUSSE CREEK
US 431 TO CO RD 51, Houston, AL
Over: MEADOWS CREEK
PLEASANTGROVE TO CO RD 75, Houston, AL
Over: RANGE ST C/GA * BAYL R R
0.5 MI.E. U.S. 231, Houston, AL
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.