Total bridges
61
Public highway bridges in Camas County
County profile · official public datasets
61 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 27.9% rated Good, 62.3% Fair, 9.8% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Camas County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across rated county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Camas County ranks #41 of 44 Idaho counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 9.8%). Camas County, Idaho contains 61 public highway bridges. Roughly 27.9% are rated “Good,” 62.3% “Fair,” and 9.8% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
61
Public highway bridges in Camas County
Good condition
27.9%
17 of 61 rated 7-9
Fair condition
62.3%
38 of 61 rated 5-6
Poor condition
9.8%
6 of 61 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#41 of 44
Among Idaho counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 61 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 2.6% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 9.8% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 124 crossings a day against 175 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 61 of 61 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
33 of the 61 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 27.9% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
SH 46 over MINEAR CREEK, built 1955, carries 590 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 6-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 742 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
61 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
1 bridges
1940–1949
1 bridges
1950–1959
18 bridges
1960–1969
13 bridges
1970–1979
4 bridges
1980–1989
7 bridges
1990–1999
1 bridges
2000–2009
2 bridges
2010–2019
7 bridges
2020–2029
7 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1950s, when 18 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 29.5% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 65 to 74 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1978) matches the Idaho average (1979).
The 5 Idaho counties nearest Camas County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 9.8% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1978 against a peer-group mean of 1975 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 43 Idaho counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power County | 70 | 28.6% | 68.6% | 2.9% | 1973 |
| Minidoka County | 66 | 28.8% | 71.2% | 0% | 1983 |
| Payette County | 65 | 13.8% | 81.5% | 4.6% | 1970 |
| Camas County (this page) | 61 | 27.9% | 62.3% | 9.8% | 1978 |
| Gem County | 57 | 28.1% | 70.2% | 1.8% | 1976 |
| Lincoln County | 53 | 18.9% | 58.5% | 22.6% | 1973 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Camas County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Camas County, both outside Idaho so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside ID (61 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside ID (1978 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER
UPPER SO.FK.BOISE RIVER, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.2 S. 5.0 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: PARIDISE CREEK
BIG SMOKY JCT, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
0.3 S. 9.5 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER
MOUTH BIG SMOKY CREEK, Camas, ID
Over: BIG SMOKY CREEK
2 MILES WEST BIG SMOKY JT, Camas, ID
Over: E 100 SOUTH ROAD
1.0 S. 0.5 N. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
0.6 N. 0.3 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: LITTLE SMOKY CREEK
UPPER LITTLE SMOKY CREEK, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.4 S. 5.0 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: PARADISE CREEK
4 MILES ABOVE METH.CAMP, Camas, ID
Over: NO NAME CREEK
11.0 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: HOT CREEK
10.3 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: ARNOLD CREEK
10.0 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: PARADISE CREEK
BIG SMOKEY ADMIN. SITE, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.9 S. 0.5 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.4 S. 2.4 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
2.0 N. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: CHIMNEY CR.;SHEEP CR.
8.4 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: CORRAL CREEK
6.8 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: THREE MILE CREEK
4.8 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: FORK OF CAMAS CREEK
27.2 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
27.3 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
27.4 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
27.8 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: BIG SMOKY CREEK
BIG SMOKY JCT, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
26.7 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: DRAIN DITCH
26.9 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: KNOWLTON CREEK
29.9 N. GOODING, Camas, ID
Over: KNOWLTON CREEK
3.4 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: JOHNSON CREEK
1.9 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: W.FK.SOLDIER CREEK
0.1 W. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: SOLDIER CREEK
0.2 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: E.FK.SOLDIER CREEK
1.2 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: SKELETON CREEK
ELMORE-CAMAS COUNTY LINE, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
0.2 S. 4.2 E. HILL CITY, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.4 S. 2.4 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Over: CAMAS CREEK
3.4 S. 2.4 E. FAIRFIELD, Camas, ID
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.