Total bridges
128
Public highway bridges in Custer County
County profile · official public datasets
128 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 34.4% rated Good, 56.3% Fair, 9.4% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Custer County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Custer County ranks #38 of 44 Idaho counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 9.4%). Custer County, Idaho contains 128 public highway bridges. Roughly 34.4% are rated “Good,” 56.3% “Fair,” and 9.4% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
128
Public highway bridges in Custer County
Good condition
34.4%
44 of 128 rated 7-9
Fair condition
56.3%
72 of 128 rated 5-6
Poor condition
9.4%
12 of 128 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#38 of 44
Among Idaho counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 128 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 5.9% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 9.4% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 171 crossings a day against 310 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 128 of 128 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
70 of the 128 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 34.4% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
SH 75 over YANKEE FK OF SALMON RIVR, built 1934, carries 660 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 12-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 2,050 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
128 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
1 bridges
1930–1939
4 bridges
1940–1949
2 bridges
1950–1959
9 bridges
1960–1969
33 bridges
1970–1979
28 bridges
1980–1989
17 bridges
1990–1999
10 bridges
2000–2009
7 bridges
2010–2019
13 bridges
2020–2029
4 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 33 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 25.8% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1978) matches the Idaho average (1979).
The 5 Idaho counties nearest Custer County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 9.4% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1978 against a peer-group mean of 1979 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 43 Idaho counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fremont County | 137 | 32.8% | 61.3% | 5.8% | 1983 |
| Custer County (this page) | 128 | 34.4% | 56.3% | 9.4% | 1978 |
| Jefferson County | 127 | 17.3% | 79.5% | 3.1% | 1973 |
| Twin Falls County | 126 | 12.7% | 84.1% | 3.2% | 1973 |
| Bannock County | 124 | 33.1% | 62.1% | 4.8% | 1981 |
| Cassia County | 116 | 15.5% | 84.5% | 0% | 1984 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Custer County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Custer County, both outside Idaho so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside ID (128 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside ID (1978 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: EAST FORK SALMON RIVER
22 MILES UP EAST FORK R., Custer, ID
Over: SALMON RIVER;BAYHORSE CR
8.5 S. 1.2 W. CHALLIS, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: SWAUGER SLOUGH
IN MACKAY, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: JORDAN CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: BIG LOST RIVER
1.5 S. 1.5 E. MACKAY, Custer, ID
Over: BIG LOST RIVER
0.2 S. MACKAY, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK RIVER
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: SALMON RIVER
7 MILES EAST STANLEY, Custer, ID
Over: SQUAW CREEK
2.9 N. 3.8 W. CLAYTON, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: BEAVER CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: EAST FORK SALMON RIVER
28 MILES UP EAST FORK R., Custer, ID
Over: ALTURAS LAKE CREEK
12 MILES SOUTH OF STANLEY, Custer, ID
Over: SALMON RIVER
4 MILES NE OF STANLEY, Custer, ID
Over: VALLEY CREEK
0.5 N. STANLEY, Custer, ID
Over: LITTLE LOST RIVER
40.5 MI. NNW OF HOWE ID, Custer, ID
Over: SEAFOAM CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: SALMON RIVER;SW.CLAYTON
0.7 S. 2.8 W. CLAYTON, Custer, ID
Over: E.FK.SALMON RIVER
2.4 S. 5.6 E. CLAYTON, Custer, ID
Over: E.FK.SALMON RIVER
5.4 S. 5.7 E. CLAYTON, Custer, ID
Over: PAASASIKWANA NAOKWAIDE
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: LOON CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: STAR HOPE CREEK
14.6 W. MACKAY, Custer, ID
Over: CROOKED CREEK
3.1 W. STANLEY, Custer, ID
Over: FOURTH OF JULY CREEK
3.8 S. OBSIDIAN, Custer, ID
Over: MARSH CREEK
CROSSES MARSH CREEK, Custer, ID
Over: PAHSIMEROI RIVER
AT ELLIS;17 N. CHALLIS, Custer, ID
Over: SQ___ CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: FISHHOOK CREEK
REDFISH LAKE BEACH AREA, Custer, ID
Over: STANLEY LAKE CREEK
1/2 MILE EAST OF HWY 21, Custer, ID
Over: PAASASIKWANA NAOKWAIDE
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: WILDHORSE CREEK
19 N.E. SUN VALLEY, Custer, ID
Over: KANE CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: KNAPP CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: THOMPSON CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: BEAVER CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: GERMANIA CEEEK
25 UP EAST FORK SALMON R., Custer, ID
Over: BEAVER CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: NELSON CREEK
19 MILES NORTH OF SUNBEAM, Custer, ID
Over: LITTLE LOST RIVER
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: YANKEE FORK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: EAST FORK BASIN CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: STAR HOPE CREEK
21.0 E. SUN VALLEY, Custer, ID
Over: W.FK MAYFIELD CREEK
19 MILES N OF SUNBEAM, Custer, ID
Over: FLOAT CREEK
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Over: N. FK. BIG LOST RIVER
NO DATA ENTERED, Custer, ID
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.