Total bridges
141
Public highway bridges in Renville County
County profile · official public datasets
141 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 66% rated Good, 24.1% Fair, 9.9% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Renville County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Renville County ranks #84 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 9.9%). Renville County, Minnesota contains 141 public highway bridges. Roughly 66% are rated “Good,” 24.1% “Fair,” and 9.9% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
141
Public highway bridges in Renville County
Good condition
66%
93 of 141 rated 7-9
Fair condition
24.1%
34 of 141 rated 5-6
Poor condition
9.9%
14 of 141 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#84 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 141 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.7% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 9.9% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 81 crossings a day against 293 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 141 of 141 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
38 of the 141 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 66% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
CSAH 12 over CHETAMBA CREEK, built 1966, carries 270 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 14-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,137 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
141 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
Built before 1900
1 bridges
1930–1939
3 bridges
1950–1959
5 bridges
1960–1969
26 bridges
1970–1979
10 bridges
1980–1989
14 bridges
1990–1999
23 bridges
2000–2009
15 bridges
2010–2019
28 bridges
2020–2029
16 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 2010s, when 28 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 19.9% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 5 to 14 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1991, 5 years newer than the Minnesota average of 1986.
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Renville County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 9.9% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1991 against a peer-group mean of 1986 is 5 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton County | 147 | 51.7% | 39.5% | 8.8% | 1986 |
| Freeborn County | 142 | 50.7% | 46.5% | 2.8% | 1981 |
| Rice County | 142 | 40.8% | 56.3% | 2.8% | 1986 |
| Roseau County | 142 | 69.7% | 27.5% | 2.8% | 1989 |
| Renville County (this page) | 141 | 66% | 24.1% | 9.9% | 1991 |
| Todd County | 136 | 75.7% | 21.3% | 2.9% | 1990 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Renville County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Renville County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (141 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1991 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: W FK BEAVER CREEK
0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 1, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
0.5 MI W OF JCT CR 60, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
0.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
0.8 MI E OF JCT CSAH 37, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
0.1 MI W OF JCT CR 61, Renville, MN
Over: W FK BEAVER CREEK
2.8 MI S OF JCT TH 212, Renville, MN
Over: BEAVER CREEK
1.0 MI N OF JCT CSAH 19, Renville, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 63
0.7 MI W OF JCT CSAH 5, Renville, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 63
1.3 MI W OF JCT TH 71, Renville, MN
Over: W FK BEAVER CREEK
1.4 MI W OF JCT TH 71, Renville, MN
Over: JD #31
0.6 MI W OF JCT CSAH 27, Renville, MN
Over: FORT RIDGELY CREEK
0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 16, Renville, MN
Over: BIRCH COULEE CREEK
1.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 2, Renville, MN
Over: BIRCH COULEE CREEK
0.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 19, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
1.5 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: JUD DITCH # 15
0.7 MI N OF JCT TH 212, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
1.6 MI E OF E JCT TH 23, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
1.5 MI W OF JCT CSAH 10, Renville, MN
Over: BEAVER CREEK
1.4 MI W OF JCT TH 71, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
0.7 MI W OF JCT CSAH 6, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
0.5 MI W OF JCT CSAH 6, Renville, MN
Over: FORT RIDGELY CREEK
0.9 MI E OF JCT CSAH 16, Renville, MN
Over: JD #7
1.2 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
1.8 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
1.7 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: MINNESOTA RIVER OVERFLOW
0.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 15, Renville, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 4
7.9 MI N OF HECTOR, Renville, MN
Over: BEAVER CREEK
0.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 2, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
1.6 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: HAWK CREEK
2.4 MI E OF JCT TH 23, Renville, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 17A
1.2 MI N OF JCT TH 212, Renville, MN
Over: FORT RIDGELY CREEK
0.1 MI W OF JCT CSAH 3, Renville, MN
Over: BIRCH COULEE CREEK
0.6 MI E OF JCT TH 71, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
0.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: BEAVER CREEK
2.0 MI E OF JCT CSAH 1, Renville, MN
Over: JUD DITCH # 2
1.2 MI S OF CO LINE, Renville, MN
Over: MIDDLE CREEK
0.7 MI W OF JCT CSAH 21, Renville, MN
Over: CHETAMBA CREEK
0.4 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11, Renville, MN
Over: STREAM
1.1 MI W OF JCT CSAH 9, Renville, MN
Over: LITTLE ROCK CREEK
0.4 MI S OF JCT CR 77, Renville, MN
Over: TIMMS CREEK
0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 15, Renville, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.