Total bridges
97
Public highway bridges in Swift County
County profile · official public datasets
97 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 75.3% rated Good, 23.7% Fair, 1% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Swift County pairs a top-10% lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with a newer average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Swift County ranks #7 of 87 Minnesota counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 1%). Swift County, Minnesota contains 97 public highway bridges. Roughly 75.3% are rated “Good,” 23.7% “Fair,” and 1% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
97
Public highway bridges in Swift County
Good condition
75.3%
73 of 97 rated 7-9
Fair condition
23.7%
23 of 97 rated 5-6
Poor condition
1%
1 of 97 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#7 of 87
Among Minnesota counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 97 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 1% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 1 crossings a day against 395 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 97 of 97 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
10 of the 97 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 75.3% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
T 312 over SHAKOPEE CREEK, built 1924, carries 1 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 1-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
97 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
2 bridges
1950–1959
1 bridges
1960–1969
3 bridges
1970–1979
14 bridges
1980–1989
19 bridges
1990–1999
23 bridges
2000–2009
14 bridges
2010–2019
16 bridges
2020–2029
5 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1990s, when 23 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 23.7% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 25 to 34 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1993, 7 years newer than the Minnesota average of 1986.
The 5 Minnesota counties nearest Swift County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 1% Poor share is the 2nd-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1993 against a peer-group mean of 1987 is 6 years newer.
Showing the 5 closest of 86 Minnesota counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sibley County | 102 | 61.8% | 37.3% | 1% | 1994 |
| Beltrami County | 101 | 63.4% | 33.7% | 3% | 1989 |
| Koochiching County | 98 | 54.1% | 38.8% | 7.1% | 1987 |
| Swift County (this page) | 97 | 75.3% | 23.7% | 1% | 1993 |
| Aitkin County | 96 | 55.2% | 36.5% | 8.3% | 1985 |
| Kandiyohi County | 94 | 48.9% | 43.6% | 7.4% | 1980 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Swift County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Swift County, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MN (97 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MN (1993 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: E BR CHIPPEWA RIVER
0.8 MI N OF JCT TH 9, Swift, MN
Over: E BR CHIPPEWA RIVER
1.4 MI N OF JCT TH 9, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
1.1 MI W OF BENSON, Swift, MN
Over: DITCH
0.5 MI E OF JCT TH 59, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK JD 19
0.1 MI S OF JCT CR 85, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
0.7 MI E OF JCT CSAH 25, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
0.8 MI S OF JCT MN 9, Swift, MN
Over: JD 8
0.6 MI W OF JCT CSAH 17, Swift, MN
Over: JD 8
0.6 MI E OF JCT CSAH 13, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
0.5 MI N OF JCT TH 12, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
1.8 MI W OF JCT TH59, Swift, MN
Over: LK HASSEL OUTLET STREAM
0.8 MI NE OF JCT TH 12, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
1.6 MI N OF JCT TH12, Swift, MN
Over: COTTONWOOD CREEK JD #8
0.1 MI E OF JCT CR 65, Swift, MN
Over: TRIB COTTONWOOD CREEK
0.5 MI S OF JCT CSAH 8, Swift, MN
Over: DITCH
0.5 MI S OF JCT CSAH 22, Swift, MN
Over: JD #5
2.7 MI S OF BENSON, Swift, MN
Over: SHAKOPEE CREEK
0.2 MI E OF JCT TH 29, Swift, MN
Over: BNSF RAIL
1.0 MI SE OF JCT CSAH 6, Swift, MN
Over: CO DITCH # 3
4.3 MI W OF JCT MN 29, Swift, MN
Over: SHAKOPEE CREEK
0.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 6, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
1.6 MI W OF JCT TH 29, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
1.0 MI W OF JCT CSAH 7, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
4.3 MI W OF JCT TH 29, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
1.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 20, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
0.3 MI W OF JCT CSAH 19, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
1.6 MI E OF W CO LINE, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
0.6 MI N OF JCT CSAH 19, Swift, MN
Over: STREAM
1.4 MI W OF JCT CR 61, Swift, MN
Over: JOINT CO DITCH # 9
1.5 E OF JCT CSAH 13, Swift, MN
Over: JOINT CO DITCH # 9
1.9 MI E OF JCT CSAH 13, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
0.6 MI NW OF JCT CSAH 33, Swift, MN
Over: STREAM
1.2 MI N OF JCT CSAH 28, Swift, MN
Over: E BR CHIPPEWA RIVER
0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 31, Swift, MN
Over: SHAKOPEE CREEK (JD #18)
8.8 MI S OF BENSON, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
2.1 MI E OF JCT CSAH 20, Swift, MN
Over: MUD CREEK
2.0 MI E OF BENSON, Swift, MN
Over: COTTONWOOD CREEK
6.6 MI E OF JCT TH 59, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
3.5 MI W OF JCT TH 29, Swift, MN
Over: DITCH
2.2 MI NE OF JCT CR 73, Swift, MN
Over: COTTONWOOD CREEK (JD #8)
1.9 MI W OF JCT CSAH 17, Swift, MN
Over: DITCH
7.0 MI S OF BENSON, Swift, MN
Over: Jud Ditch # 8
0.8 mi E of jct CR 65, Swift, MN
Over: COTTONWOOD CREEK
2.9 MI W OF JCT CSAH 17, Swift, MN
Over: Mud Creek (JD # 19)
0.8 mi E of jct TH 12, Swift, MN
Over: DITCH
1.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH6, Swift, MN
Over: CHIPPEWA RIVER
2.0 MI N OF JCT US 12, Swift, MN
Over: POMME DE TERRE RIVER
0.4 MI E OF JCT CSAH 7, Swift, MN
Over: COTTONWOOD CREEK
0.5 MI E OF JCT CR 65, Swift, MN
Over: JUD DITCH # 8
0.8 MI W OF JCT CSAH 17, Swift, MN
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.