Total bridges
136
Public highway bridges in Hoke County
County profile · official public datasets
136 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 39% rated Good, 35.3% Fair, 25.7% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Hoke County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Hoke County ranks #100 of 100 North Carolina counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 25.7%). Hoke County, North Carolina contains 136 public highway bridges. Roughly 39% are rated “Good,” 35.3% “Fair,” and 25.7% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
136
Public highway bridges in Hoke County
Good condition
39%
53 of 136 rated 7-9
Fair condition
35.3%
48 of 136 rated 5-6
Poor condition
25.7%
35 of 136 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#100 of 100
Among North Carolina counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 136 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.3% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 25.7% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 13 crossings a day against 876 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 136 of 136 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
78 of the 136 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 39% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
SR1436 over BIG MARSH SWAMP, built 1951, carries 410 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 35-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 468 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
136 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1930–1939
1 bridges
1950–1959
10 bridges
1960–1969
44 bridges
1970–1979
24 bridges
1980–1989
2 bridges
1990–1999
5 bridges
2000–2009
8 bridges
2010–2019
42 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 44 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 32.4% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1983) matches the North Carolina average (1986).
The 5 North Carolina counties nearest Hoke County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 25.7% Poor share is the 6th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1983 against a peer-group mean of 1982 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 99 North Carolina counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenoir County | 145 | 52.4% | 44.8% | 2.8% | 1993 |
| Hoke County (this page) | 136 | 39% | 35.3% | 25.7% | 1983 |
| Harnett County | 134 | 50.7% | 44.8% | 4.5% | 1983 |
| Swain County | 129 | 25.6% | 62.8% | 11.6% | 1973 |
| Mitchell County | 127 | 35.4% | 39.4% | 25.2% | 1981 |
| Polk County | 127 | 35.4% | 53.5% | 11% | 1978 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Hoke County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Hoke County, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside NC (136 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside NC (1983 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: JUMPING RUN CREEK
PU 703 899, Hoke, NC
Over: PUPPY CREEK
PU 702 815, Hoke, NC
Over: NICHOLSON CREEK
PU 632 836, Hoke, NC
Over: FIELD BRANCH
RANGE EE3 (S) AREA, Hoke, NC
Over: TRIB TO LAKE MACARTHUR
RANGE Y4 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: NICHOLSON CREEK
RANGE JJ (N), Hoke, NC
Over: FIELD BRANCH
RANGE EE3 (S), Hoke, NC
Over: FIREBREAK 9
RANGE V1 (N), Hoke, NC
Over: FIELD BRANCH
RANGE EE3 (E), Hoke, NC
Over: FLAT CREEK
RANGE V2, Hoke, NC
Over: GUM BRANCH
RANGE EE2 (N), Hoke, NC
Over: JUNIPER CREEK
PU 593 844, Hoke, NC
Over: DEEP CREEK
PU 681 921, Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE GG1 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE GG1 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: MCDUFFIE CREEK
RANGE I12 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE CC1 (SW) AREA, Hoke, NC
Over: SILVER RUN
RANGE BB1 (E) AREA, Hoke, NC
Over: TUCKAHOE CREEK
RANGE X1 (W) AREA, Hoke, NC
Over: DEEP CREEK
RANGE R (N), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE CC1 (S), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE GG2 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE CC1 (SW), Hoke, NC
Over: PINEY BOTTOM CREEK
RANGE CC1 (E), Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
RANGE BB2 (W), Hoke, NC
Over: PINEY BOTTOM CREEK
RANGE CC2 (S), Hoke, NC
Over: NICHOLSON CREEK
PU 632 836, Hoke, NC
Over: MOUNTAIN CREEK
0.3 MI. W. JCT. SR1216, Hoke, NC
Over: RAFT SWAMP
0.5 MI. N. JCT. SR1447, Hoke, NC
Over: RAFT SWAMP
0.4 MI. N. JCT. SR1105, Hoke, NC
Over: LITTLE RAFT SWAMP
0.3 MI. S. OF JCT. SR1124, Hoke, NC
Over: BEAVER CREEK
0.1 MI. W. JCT. SR1412, Hoke, NC
Over: BRANCH OF RAFT SWAMP
0.2 MI. N. JCT. SR1134, Hoke, NC
Over: FORK OF RAFT SWAMP
0.4 MI. N. JCT. SR1135, Hoke, NC
Over: FORK OF RAFT SWAMP
0.4 MI. N. JCT. SR1135, Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
0.2 MI.W.JCT.SR1422, Hoke, NC
Over: PUPPY CREEK
0.4 MI. W. JCT. SR1413, Hoke, NC
Over: TONEYS CREEK
0.8 MI.E.JCT.SR1116, Hoke, NC
Over: McNEILS MILL CREEK
1.1 MI. N. JCT. SR1436, Hoke, NC
Over: LUMBER RIVER
0.5 MI. S. JCT. SR1211, Hoke, NC
Over: ROCKFISH CREEK
0.1 MI.W.JCT.SR 1422, Hoke, NC
Over: MOUNTAIN CREEK
1.1 MI. N. JCT. SR1215, Hoke, NC
Over: PUPPY CREEK
0.4 MI. W. JCT. SR1413, Hoke, NC
Over: BIG MIDDLE SWAMP
0.2 MI. N. JCT. SR1136, Hoke, NC
Over: PUPPY CREEK
0.2M. E. JCT. SR1412, Hoke, NC
Over: LITTLE RAFT SWAMP
0.3 MI. S. JCT. SR1129, Hoke, NC
Over: ABERDEEN ROCKFISH RR
0.4 MI. E. JCT. NC211, Hoke, NC
Over: RAFT SWAMP
0.3 MI. N. JCT. SR1447, Hoke, NC
Over: NICHOLSON CREEK
1.5 MI. E. JCT. SR1300, Hoke, NC
Over: STEWARTS CREEK
0.7 MI. E. JCT. SR1406, Hoke, NC
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.