Total bridges
60
Public highway bridges in Juab County
County profile · official public datasets
60 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 8.3% rated Good, 88.3% Fair, 3.3% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Juab County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across rated county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Juab County ranks #19 of 29 Utah counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 3.3%). Juab County, Utah contains 60 public highway bridges. Roughly 8.3% are rated “Good,” 88.3% “Fair,” and 3.3% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
60
Public highway bridges in Juab County
Good condition
8.3%
5 of 60 rated 7-9
Fair condition
88.3%
53 of 60 rated 5-6
Poor condition
3.3%
2 of 60 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#19 of 29
Among Utah counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 60 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 3% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 3.4% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 20,752 crossings a day against 1,001 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 59 of 60 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
15 of the 60 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 8.3% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
I-15 (SR-15) NBL over DEER CROSSING, built 1984, carries 34,167 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 2-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 41,503 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
60 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
1 bridges
1940–1949
1 bridges
1950–1959
2 bridges
1970–1979
13 bridges
1980–1989
40 bridges
1990–1999
1 bridges
2000–2009
1 bridges
2010–2019
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1980s, when 40 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 66.7% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 35 to 44 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1980) matches the Utah average (1984).
The 5 Utah counties nearest Juab County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 3.3% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1980 against a peer-group mean of 1976 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 28 Utah counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron County | 70 | 10% | 88.6% | 1.4% | 1977 |
| Juab County (this page) | 60 | 8.3% | 88.3% | 3.3% | 1980 |
| Beaver County | 53 | 17% | 79.2% | 3.8% | 1977 |
| Morgan County | 53 | 0% | 96.2% | 3.8% | 1967 |
| Sanpete County | 52 | 30.8% | 69.2% | 0% | 1986 |
| San Juan County | 50 | 24% | 74% | 2% | 1974 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Juab County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Juab County, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside UT (60 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside UT (1980 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: SALT CREEK
EAST SIDE OF NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: DEEP CREEK
DEEP CREEK CANYON, Juab, UT
Over: SEVIER RIVER
11.5 MILES N. OF SCIPIO, Juab, UT
Over: SALT CREEK
300 NORTH MAIN IN NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: SEVIER RIVER
5.8 MI EAST OF LEAMINGTON, Juab, UT
Over: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
NORTH OF MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: Deer Crossing
2 Mi. S. of Mona Int., Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
2 MI.SO.MONA INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: CO. RD. TO NORTH CANYON
2 MI. NO. OF MONA INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: CO. RD. NEAR STEEL RANCH
5.4 MI.NO. OF MONA INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: CO. RD. TO NORTH CANYON
2 MI. NO. of MONA INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: CO. RD. NEAR STEEL RANCH
5.4 MI.NO. OF MONA INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: I-15 (SR-15) NBL AND SBL
NORTH OF NO. NEPHI INT., Juab, UT
Over: SR-54 INTCHG. X-ROAD
MONA INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
NORTH OF MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: SR-54 INTCHG. X-ROAD
MONA INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO LAMPSON CY.
8 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO LAMPSON CY.
8 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: SALT CREEK
50 E. 50 S. IN NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: CHICKEN CREEK OFLOW
NORTH OF MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
MILLARD-JUAB COUNTY LINE, Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
MILLARD-JUAB COUNTY LINE, Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
4 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
8.5 MI.NO. OF MONA INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: DEER CROSSING
8.5 MI.NO. OF MONA INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: SEVIER RIVER
1 MILE WEST OF MILLS, Juab, UT
Over: 700 NORTH STREET NEPHI
NE. SIDE OF NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: 700 NORTH STREET NEPHI
NO.EAST SIDE OF NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
SO.OF SOUTH NEPHI INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
SO.OF SOUTH NEPHI INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: I-15 (SR-15) NBL & S
YUBA STATE PARK INTERCHG., Juab, UT
Over: CHRISS WASH
7 MILES SOUTH OF LEVAN, Juab, UT
Over: I-15 (SR-15) NBL & S
1 MI.SO.MONA INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO SAGE VALLEY
6 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO SAGE VALLEY
6 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO WIDE CANYON
10 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY RD.TO WIDE CANYON
10 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: SEVIER RIVER
11.5 MI.NORTH OF SCIPIO, Juab, UT
Over: SEVIER RIVER
11.5 MI.NORTH of SCIPIO, Juab, UT
Over: CNTY.RD. AND DRAIN CANAL
12 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: CNTY.RD. AND DRNG CNL
12 MI.NO.MILLS JCT.INTCHG, Juab, UT
Over: SR-78 INTCHG. X-ROAD
AT MILLS JCT. INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: CENTRAL UTAH CANAL
4.3 MI EAST OF LEAMINGTON, Juab, UT
Over: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
SO.OF SOUTH NEPHI INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: SR-78 INTCHG. X-ROAD
AT MILLS JCT. INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY ROAD
.5 MI.SO.SO.NEPHI INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: COUNTY ROAD
.5 MI.SO.SO.NEPHI INTCHG., Juab, UT
Over: SR-132 INTCHG. X-ROAD
EAST SIDE OF NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: SR-132 INTCHG. X-ROAD
EAST SIDE OF NEPHI, Juab, UT
Over: SR-28 INTCHG. X-RD
SOUTH NEPHI INTERCHANGE, Juab, UT
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.