NFA 1503 (SA 2322)
Carrying NFA 1503 (SA 2322) over TOWN CREEK
2 MI N OF NEWBERN, Dyer, Tennessee
Data updated May 2026
FHWA NBI record, refreshed with each annual release.
Bridge Snapshot: NFA 1503 (SA 2322)
The NFA 1503 (SA 2322) bridge in Dyer, Tennessee carries NFA 1503 (SA 2322) over TOWN CREEK. It was built in 2000, making it 26 years old today. The structure is built primarily of concrete and spans 1 section, stretching 10.0 meters (33 feet) end to end. Daily traffic averages 439 vehicles, placing it in the lower-traffic tier of Tennessee bridges. It is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
The latest FHWA inspection records show culvert at 7/9. The weakest component sits in good condition. All reported major components score above the Poor range. Its NBI inventory load rating is 24.3 metric tons.
Sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See our methodology for refresh cadence and NBI release vintage.
How NFA 1503 (SA 2322) compares
Live comparison across Tennessee.
Historical Sufficiency Rating
PlainBridge-computedFHWA discontinued this calculated item; it does not determine current condition, funding eligibility, posting, or closure. How the historical reference is calculated.
Condition Ratings
Full 0–9 scale + sufficiency-rating breakdown: how condition ratings work.
Structural Details
- Year Built
- 2000
- Material
- Concrete
- Number of Spans
- 1
- Structure Length
- 10.0 m (33 ft)
- Deck Width
- 11.6 m (38 ft)
- Owner
- County Highway Agency
- Avg Daily Traffic
- 439 vehicles/day
- Structure Number
- 23015030001
Location
Data Source
FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
FHWA NBI Program ↗How to read this record
This page shows what the last federal inspection recorded, not whether NFA 1503 (SA 2322) is safe to cross today. Here is how to use it.
- NBI condition ratings reflect the latest record in this annual dataset, not a live status. Current routine inspection intervals are risk-based.
- Learn how the 0–9 condition scale and Good/Fair/Poor categories are defined. How condition ratings work
- Compare NFA 1503 (SA 2322) against other structures in Dyer and across Tennessee. Tennessee bridges
- Noticed visible damage or a safety concern? Report it to the agency that owns the bridge, or call 911 in an emergency. How to report a bridge
Condition codes come straight from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory and are not a real-time safety judgment. Only the owning agency, a state DOT, county, or other owner, can post, restrict, or close a bridge.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the condition ratings mean for NFA 1503 (SA 2322)?
NFA 1503 (SA 2322) in Dyer, Tennessee on the FHWA's 0–9 scale.
How often is NFA 1503 (SA 2322) inspected?
NFA 1503 (SA 2322)'s responsible agency sets its routine interval under FHWA's risk-based inspection rules; this page does not expose the scheduled interval. It carries about 439 vehicles per day.
What does “structurally deficient” mean in older bridge reports?
FHWA retired that reported status beginning with the 2018 archive. NFA 1503 (SA 2322) is currently shown as Good condition from its component ratings; that category is not a live closure or safety decision.
What is the inventory load rating for NFA 1503 (SA 2322)?
NFA 1503 (SA 2322) has an NBI inventory load rating of 24.3 metric tons.
Who is responsible for maintaining NFA 1503 (SA 2322)?
NFA 1503 (SA 2322) is owned and maintained by County Highway Agency.
How old is NFA 1503 (SA 2322) and does age affect safety?
NFA 1503 (SA 2322) was built in 2000, making it 26 years old.
Disclaimer: Bridge condition data is from the FHWA NBI and reflects the last reported inspection. A Poor condition rating is not a live declaration that a bridge is closed or unsafe for travel. For current closure, posting, or safety information, contact the responsible transportation agency.
Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.