Total bridges
210
Public highway bridges in Amite County
County profile · official public datasets
210 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 69% rated Good, 21.4% Fair, 9.5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Amite County posts a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Amite County ranks #68 of 82 Mississippi counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 9.5%). Amite County, Mississippi contains 210 public highway bridges. Roughly 69% are rated “Good,” 21.4% “Fair,” and 9.5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
210
Public highway bridges in Amite County
Good condition
69%
145 of 210 rated 7-9
Fair condition
21.4%
45 of 210 rated 5-6
Poor condition
9.5%
20 of 210 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#68 of 82
Among Mississippi counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 210 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 1.1% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 9.5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 65 crossings a day against 644 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 210 of 210 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
68 of the 210 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 69% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
LOWER CENTREVILLE over WEST FORK AMITE RIVER, built 1960, carries 170 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 20-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,300 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
210 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1930–1939
5 bridges
1940–1949
3 bridges
1950–1959
14 bridges
1960–1969
28 bridges
1970–1979
32 bridges
1980–1989
27 bridges
1990–1999
36 bridges
2000–2009
28 bridges
2010–2019
31 bridges
2020–2029
6 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1990s, when 36 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 17.1% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 25 to 34 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1987) matches the Mississippi average (1986).
The 5 Mississippi counties nearest Amite County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 9.5% Poor share is the 5th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1987 against a peer-group mean of 1988 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 81 Mississippi counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcorn County | 213 | 64.8% | 33.8% | 1.4% | 1991 |
| Calhoun County | 213 | 48.8% | 40.8% | 10.3% | 1985 |
| Holmes County | 212 | 52.4% | 39.6% | 8% | 1988 |
| Kemper County | 211 | 60.2% | 37% | 2.8% | 1991 |
| Pike County | 211 | 55.5% | 38.9% | 5.7% | 1984 |
| Amite County (this page) | 210 | 69% | 21.4% | 9.5% | 1987 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Amite County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Amite County, both outside Mississippi so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside MS (210 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside MS (1987 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: CASTON CREEK
SEC 4 T 4N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: BERRY CREEK
SEC 9 T 1N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: SHOCKALOA CREEK
SEC 18 T 4N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: DAVIS CREEK
SEC 15 T 1N R 4E, Amite, MS
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
3.2 MI E SR 569, Amite, MS
Over: FRESHLEY BRANCH
SEC 14 T 2N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL BRANCH
SEC 29 T 4N R 2E B, Amite, MS
Over: E FORK WAGGONER CREEK
6.5 MI E SR 33, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL CREEK
SEC 26 T 4N R 3E, Amite, MS
Over: RELIEF
4.2 MI E SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: TICKFAW CREEK
SEC 26 T 2N R 6E, Amite, MS
Over: WILSON CREEK
SEC 11 T 3N R 6E B, Amite, MS
Over: TANYARD CREEK
0.1 MI E SR 567 NORTH, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL BRANCH
SEC 36 T 4N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: THOMPSON CREEK
SEC 6 T 3N R 6E, Amite, MS
Over: EAST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 6 T 3N R 6E B, Amite, MS
Over: WEST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 24 T 4N R 4E B, Amite, MS
Over: SHAW CREEK
2.2 MI S SR 48, Amite, MS
Over: WEST FORK AMITE RIVER
6.0 MI N SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: HURRICANE CREEK
SEC 22 T 1N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: FOSTER CREEK
7.1 MI W SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: FOSTER CREEK
7.4 MI W SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: SHACKALOA CREEK
4.3 MI W SR 569, Amite, MS
Over: GORDON CREEK
9.1 MI N SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: HORSE CREEK
1.4 MI S SR 570, Amite, MS
Over: BEAVER CREEK RELIEF
0.5 MI N LA STATE LINE, Amite, MS
Over: WAGONER CREEK
SEC 10 T 2N R 3E, Amite, MS
Over: LOVE CREEK
SEC 21 T 2N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: WEST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 3 T 3N R 4E B, Amite, MS
Over: BEAVER CREEK
0.6 MI N LA STATE LINE, Amite, MS
Over: RELIEF BRUSHY CREEK
SEC 27 T 4N R 2E B, Amite, MS
Over: BRUSHY CREEK
SEC 27 T 4N R 2E B, Amite, MS
Over: GORDON CREEK
SEC 31 T 4N R 6E, Amite, MS
Over: RELIEF
7.2 MI E SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: TICKFAW RIVER
0.4 MI E SR 568, Amite, MS
Over: BUCKLES CREEK
SEC 26 T 4N R 3E, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL CREEK
SEC 29 T 2N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: WEST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 13 T 3N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL CREEK
SEC 11 T 4N R 4E, Amite, MS
Over: CUBA CREEK
10.4 MI E SR 24, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL CREEK
SEC 4 T 3N R 6E B, Amite, MS
Over: BEAVER CREEK
SEC 28 T 1N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: WEST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 36 T 1N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: EAST FORK AMITE RIVER
SEC 10 T 2N R 5E B, Amite, MS
Over: UNNAMED STREAM
6.4 MI W PIKE CL, Amite, MS
Over: BEAVER CREEK RELIEF
SEC 28 T 1N R 3E B, Amite, MS
Over: SMALL DRAIN
SEC 17 T 1N R 2E, Amite, MS
Over: BERRY CREEK
SEC 27 T 1N R 3E, Amite, MS
Over: SEABURY CREEK
SEC 26 T 2N R 2E, Amite, MS
Over: ROCKY BRANCH
SEC 14 T 4N R 2E, Amite, MS
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.