Total bridges
303
Public highway bridges in Custer County
County profile · official public datasets
303 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 58.4% rated Good, 33.7% Fair, 7.9% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Custer County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Custer County ranks #52 of 88 Nebraska counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 7.9%). Custer County, Nebraska contains 303 public highway bridges. Roughly 58.4% are rated “Good,” 33.7% “Fair,” and 7.9% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
303
Public highway bridges in Custer County
Good condition
58.4%
177 of 303 rated 7-9
Fair condition
33.7%
102 of 303 rated 5-6
Poor condition
7.9%
24 of 303 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#52 of 88
Among Nebraska counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 303 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.8% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 7.9% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 42 crossings a day against 493 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 303 of 303 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
147 of the 303 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 58.4% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
FAS 1670 over SPRING CREEK, built 1963, carries 425 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 24-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,015 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
303 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1910–1919
3 bridges
1920–1929
11 bridges
1930–1939
45 bridges
1940–1949
15 bridges
1950–1959
17 bridges
1960–1969
46 bridges
1970–1979
38 bridges
1980–1989
51 bridges
1990–1999
30 bridges
2000–2009
12 bridges
2010–2019
23 bridges
2020–2029
12 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1980s, when 51 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 16.8% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 35 to 44 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1971, 6 years older than the Nebraska average of 1977.
The 5 Nebraska counties nearest Custer County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 7.9% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1971 against a peer-group mean of 1978 is 7 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 87 Nebraska counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knox County | 329 | 60.5% | 36.5% | 3% | 1981 |
| Cedar County | 313 | 47% | 46.6% | 6.4% | 1977 |
| Saline County | 312 | 67.3% | 24.7% | 8% | 1981 |
| Custer County (this page) | 303 | 58.4% | 33.7% | 7.9% | 1971 |
| Madison County | 302 | 36.4% | 55.3% | 8.3% | 1981 |
| Dawson County | 300 | 68% | 28.3% | 3.7% | 1972 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Custer County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Custer County, both outside Nebraska so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside NE (303 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside NE (1971 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: MIDDLE LOUP RIVER
0W COMSTOCK, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
5N 5W OF CALLAWAY #516, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
3.2NW OF BERWYN, Custer, NE
Over: STUMP DITCH
14.5W 2.5S OF OCONTO #421, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
4SE BROKEN BOW, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
7W 5.5N OF CALLAWAY, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
3E OF CALLAWAY #527, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
WCL ARNOLD, Custer, NE
Over: WOOD RIVER TRIB
1S OCONTO, Custer, NE
Over: ELK CREEK
7S 2W OF MASON CITY #663, Custer, NE
Over: ELK CREEK
10S ANSLEY, Custer, NE
Over: COMER CANYON
0S ANSLEY, Custer, NE
Over: WOOD RIVER
2SE OF OCONTO #567, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK TRIB/OVERFLOW
2E BROKEN BOW, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
1E BROKEN BOW, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
1SE OF ANSLEY #612, Custer, NE
Over: WAGNER CREEK
4W COMSTOCK, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
5NW LITCHFIELD, Custer, NE
Over: ASH CREEK
1.5N 10E OF CALLAWAY #244, Custer, NE
Over: CAT CREEK
14.7S ANSLEY #645, Custer, NE
Over: CAT CREEK
9S 5W OF MASON CITY, Custer, NE
Over: DUTCH CREEK TRIB
4.7S 3E OF MASON C. #621A, Custer, NE
Over: WOOD RIVER
.5S 1E OF OCONTO NO. 509A, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
4S 4W OF CALLAWAY #429, Custer, NE
Over: MIDDLE LOUP RIVER TRIB
3.5N 1W OF COMSTOCK #60, Custer, NE
Over: MILBURN-SARGENT CANAL
2N 8W OF SARGENT, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER TRIB
JCT N2/N70 3.7S 18.2W, Custer, NE
Over: SPRING CREEK
2N 3.5E OF CALLAWAY #502, Custer, NE
Over: WAGNER CREEK
1S 5W OF COMSTOCK #52, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
5E 2.8N OCONTO #572, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
4SE .5S BROKEN BOW, Custer, NE
Over: SOUTH LOUP RIVER
2N 2.5W OF CALLAWAY, Custer, NE
Over: CLEAR CREEK
4N 6.7E OF ANSLEY #629, Custer, NE
Over: CLEAR CREEK
1.5N .5W WESTERVILLE #18, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
3E 1S OF MASON CITY #616, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
1.5S 1.5E OF BERWYN #160, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
1NW BERWYN #148, Custer, NE
Over: CLEAR CREEK
6.5N .5E OF ANSLEY #23, Custer, NE
Over: MILBURN-SARGENT CANAL
2.5N 12W OF SARGENT, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
3W OF BERWYN #245, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
.7NW OF MASON CITY #650A, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
1.5E .2N MASON CITY N.619, Custer, NE
Over: MUD CREEK
ANSLEY OLD US183 @ N2, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
2W OF MASON CITY #657A, Custer, NE
Over: CLEAR CREEK
6.5N 1.7E OF ANSLEY #26, Custer, NE
Over: MILBURN-SARGENT CANAL
2N 1.5W OF SARGENT, Custer, NE
Over: MILBURN-SARGENT CANAL
13W 3N OF SARGENT #110A, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
3.5NW BERWYN #237, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
1.5N OF WESTERVILLE #19, Custer, NE
Over: STREAM
EJCT US183/N92 4E 1.4S, Custer, NE
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.