Total bridges
155
Public highway bridges in Haskell County
County profile · official public datasets
155 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 36.8% rated Good, 56.8% Fair, 6.5% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Haskell County pairs a higher-than-median Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state with an older average build year than the state inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Haskell County ranks #39 of 77 Oklahoma counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 6.5%). Haskell County, Oklahoma contains 155 public highway bridges. Roughly 36.8% are rated “Good,” 56.8% “Fair,” and 6.5% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
155
Public highway bridges in Haskell County
Good condition
36.8%
57 of 155 rated 7-9
Fair condition
56.8%
88 of 155 rated 5-6
Poor condition
6.5%
10 of 155 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#39 of 77
Among Oklahoma counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 155 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.8% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 6.5% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 110 crossings a day against 620 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 155 of 155 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
80 of the 155 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 36.8% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
3122C/ E1270 over BEAVER CREEK, built 1960, carries 200 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 10-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 1,100 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
155 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1920–1929
7 bridges
1930–1939
22 bridges
1940–1949
19 bridges
1950–1959
15 bridges
1960–1969
15 bridges
1970–1979
7 bridges
1980–1989
14 bridges
1990–1999
18 bridges
2000–2009
12 bridges
2010–2019
21 bridges
2020–2029
5 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1930s, when 22 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 14.2% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 85 to 94 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year is 1972, 5 years older than the Oklahoma average of 1977.
The 5 Oklahoma counties nearest Haskell County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 6.5% Poor share is the 4th-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1972 against a peer-group mean of 1977 is 5 years older.
Showing the 5 closest of 76 Oklahoma counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware County | 160 | 34.4% | 47.5% | 18.1% | 1975 |
| Haskell County (this page) | 155 | 36.8% | 56.8% | 6.5% | 1972 |
| Johnston County | 154 | 40.3% | 55.8% | 3.9% | 1976 |
| Roger Mills County | 153 | 92.2% | 7.8% | 0% | 1982 |
| Ellis County | 152 | 40.1% | 59.9% | 0% | 1975 |
| Jefferson County | 150 | 46.7% | 46% | 7.3% | 1975 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Haskell County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Haskell County, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside OK (155 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside OK (1972 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: EMACHAYA CREEK TRIB.
2E OF HWY 9 & 71, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
4.3N; 1E OF HWY 9 & 71, Haskell, OK
Over: KINGS CREEK TRIB.
.5E; 1.3S OF WHITEFIELD, Haskell, OK
Over: TOWN CREEK
.5N; .9E OF JCT SH9/SH82, Haskell, OK
Over: MCCANN CREEK TRIB.
.4N OF STAR, Haskell, OK
Over: LITTLE SAN BOIS CREEK
2.4N OF S.H. 9, Haskell, OK
Over: MULE CREEK
1.8N 2.5W OF HWY 31 & 26, Haskell, OK
Over: COAL CREEK
1S; .8E OF CARTERSVILLE, Haskell, OK
Over: ROCK CREEK TRIB.
2E; 1S OF MC CURTAIN, Haskell, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
.5N; 2.2E OF LEQUIRE, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
1.2N;1.4W OF MCCURTAIN, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
.4N; 1.2W OF STIGLER, Haskell, OK
Over: ELM CREEK
3.5S .2W OF S.H. 9/S.H. 2, Haskell, OK
Over: BEAR CREEK
3S 3.4W OF SH9/SH71 JCT, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
2.2N;3W OF KEOTA, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
0.3 MI S OF SH 9, Haskell, OK
Over: ROCK CREEK TRIB.
1.2S; 2.2E OF MC CURTAIN, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
1.1S; 2.2W OF KINTA, Haskell, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
2S 2.5W OFMCCURTAIN, Haskell, OK
Over: SAN BOIS CREEK
1.5 S OF KINTA, Haskell, OK
Over: EMACHAYA CREEK
1.7 S JCT SH-9, Haskell, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
4.5E .7N OF SH31-82 INT., Haskell, OK
Over: LITTLE SANS BOIS CR.
.6E OF GARLAND, Haskell, OK
Over: OTTER CREEK
.6S; .3E OF SH9;KEOTA, Haskell, OK
Over: LITTLE SAN BOIS TRIB.
2.7N; .5E OF GARLAND, Haskell, OK
Over: SAN BOIS CREEK
3.5S 4.5E OF STIGLER, Haskell, OK
Over: KING CREEK
0.9 E JCT SH-2, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
2.3N; .2E OF KEOTA, Haskell, OK
Over: OWL CREEK
8.6 N JCT SH-31, Haskell, OK
Over: TOWN CREEK
.5N 1E OF SH9/SH82, Haskell, OK
Over: TURKEY CREEK
.4N OF SH82-31 INTER., Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
3.6S 3W OF SH9/SH2 JCT, Haskell, OK
Over: CHICKASAW CR. TRIB.
3S; .5E OF KINTA, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
4N 1.6W OF HWY 2&31 JCT, Haskell, OK
Over: BEAVER CREEK TRIB.
4N 2.3W OF HWY 2&31 JCT, Haskell, OK
Over: ELM BRANCH
2E .7N of SH9/SH26, Haskell, OK
Over: TALOKA CREEK
1N .5E of STIGLER, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
.3S 3W of S.H. 9/S.H. 26, Haskell, OK
Over: OTTER CREEK TRIB.
.7S .7W OF KEOTA, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
1E of STAR, Haskell, OK
Over: BEAVER CREEK
1.3 W JCT S.H. 31, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
4.1 E JCT SH-26, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
.6N 1.5W OF WHITEFIELD, Haskell, OK
Over: OWL CREEK
5.6 N JCT S.H. 31, Haskell, OK
Over: SANDY CREEK
3.8 N JCT SH-9, Haskell, OK
Over: SNAKE CREEK TRIB.
1N 2W OF STIGLER, Haskell, OK
Over: OWL CREEK
1.3S .5W OF MC CURTAIN, Haskell, OK
Over: TALOKA CREEK
2.8N; .5W OF STIGLER, Haskell, OK
Over: CREEK
2.8S; OF KINTA, Haskell, OK
Over: CACHE CREEK
2S; OF KEOTA, Haskell, OK
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.