Total bridges
111
Public highway bridges in Texas County
County profile · official public datasets
111 public highway bridges tracked in the FHWA National Bridge Inventory: 40.5% rated Good, 58.6% Fair, 0.9% Poor.
The verdict
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory.
Texas County posts a top-10% lowest Poor-condition share among rated counties in the state across mid-size county bridge inventory.
Poor is an FHWA condition category from the lowest applicable component rating (4 or below), not a live crossing-safety or closure decision. Rankings cover counties with at least five public highway bridges.
According to the Federal Highway Administration's 2024 National Bridge Inventory, Texas County ranks #5 of 77 Oklahoma counties with at least 5 public highway bridges on Poor-condition share (lower share ranks better; currently 0.9%). Texas County, Oklahoma contains 111 public highway bridges. Roughly 40.5% are rated “Good,” 58.6% “Fair,” and 0.9% “Poor.” Poor means the lowest applicable deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert rating is 4 or below on the 0–9 NBI scale. It is a condition category, not a live safety or closure decision.
Responsible agencies inspect covered bridges on risk-based intervals under current NBIS rules and submit inventory data to FHWA annually. The list below shows every NBI-tracked bridge in the county. Use the “Sort by” controls to change the ordering, and click any row for its reported inspection date, traffic count, and condition fields.
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory. See methodology for full definitions.
Total bridges
111
Public highway bridges in Texas County
Good condition
40.5%
45 of 111 rated 7-9
Fair condition
58.6%
65 of 111 rated 5-6
Poor condition
0.9%
1 of 111 rated 4 or below
In-state Poor-share rank
#5 of 77
Among Oklahoma counties with 5+ bridges, lower share ranks better
Share of 111 NBI-tracked bridges by lowest applicable component rating.
That is 0.4% of the county's reported daily bridge traffic on 0.9% of its bridges: Poor-condition structures carry less traffic than their share of the inventory. Each Poor bridge averages 500 crossings a day against 1,136 for a Good-condition one. A Poor rating is a condition category, not a closure or a live safety judgement; it means the lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below.
Computed over the 111 of 111 bridges in this county that report an average daily traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
67 of the 111 bridges with a recorded construction year were built in 1974 or earlier. Age alone is not a defect: a well-maintained older bridge can rate Good, and 40.5% of this county's inventory does. Even so, this older cohort is the population from which future Poor ratings are drawn, which is why the age profile below matters alongside the condition split above.
Cutoff derives from the 2024 release year minus a 50-year design life. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
S.H. 94 over BEAVER RIVER, built 1976, carries 500 vehicles a day, the most of any Poor-rated structure here. The county's Poor-condition exposure is concentrated rather than evenly spread, so the 1-bridge count understates how much of the daily burden sits on a single crossing.
Share is of the 500 daily crossings on Poor-rated bridges that report a traffic count. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
111 bridges with a recorded construction year, grouped by decade
1930–1939
10 bridges
1940–1949
1 bridges
1950–1959
12 bridges
1960–1969
31 bridges
1970–1979
18 bridges
1980–1989
15 bridges
1990–1999
9 bridges
2000–2009
8 bridges
2010–2019
6 bridges
2020–2029
1 bridges
What this shows Construction peaked in the 1960s, when 31 of the county's bridges still in the inventory were built, which is 27.9% of those with a recorded year. That cohort is now 55 to 64 years old in the 2024 inventory. Its average build year (1974) matches the Oklahoma average (1977).
The 5 Oklahoma counties nearest Texas County in number of bridges, with their condition splits. Its 0.9% Poor share is the 1st-lowest of these 6. Its average build year of 1974 against a peer-group mean of 1974 is in line with the group.
Showing the 5 closest of 76 Oklahoma counties eligible for comparison.
| County | Bridges | Good | Fair | Poor | Avg. built |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murray County | 129 | 46.5% | 51.2% | 2.3% | 1976 |
| Harper County | 128 | 33.6% | 64.8% | 1.6% | 1975 |
| Nowata County | 126 | 44.4% | 42.9% | 12.7% | 1980 |
| Texas County (this page) | 111 | 40.5% | 58.6% | 0.9% | 1974 |
| Harmon County | 106 | 75.5% | 23.6% | 0.9% | 1968 |
| Cimarron County | 93 | 49.5% | 49.5% | 1.1% | 1972 |
Each share is of that county's own total tracked bridges; peers are the counties with 5 or more bridges whose inventory size is closest to Texas County's. Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release.
Two NBI-derived peer sets for Texas County, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not the same-state size table above.
Nearest county inventories outside OK (111 bridges here).
Nearest mean year-built outside OK (1974 here).
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 release. Peers floor at 10 bridges so stub inventories cannot own the match.
Over: BEAVER RIVER
1.3E 3N OF GUYMON, Texas, OK
Over: HACKBERRY CREEK
2.2E 4.1S OF HARDESTY, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
1.E 6.4S OF 4 CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: GOFF CREEK
19E .3S OF FOUR CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: TEEPEE CREEK
3. W 1.1 S OF 4 CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
5.9S 4.W .5S OF US56/SH95, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
.1NW .1W 7.2N OF GOODWELL, Texas, OK
Over: PONY CREEK
13.5 MI W OF HOOKER, Texas, OK
Over: HACKBERRY CREEK
.2E 5.8 MI S OF HARDESTY, Texas, OK
Over: DRY CREEK
.2E 1.1 MI S OF HARDESTY, Texas, OK
Over: PALO DURO CREEK
5.2E 5.S .9E OF HARDESTY, Texas, OK
Over: LITTLE GOFF CREEK
15.W 1.3N OF FOUR CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
5.9 N OF TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
7 MI W OF HOOKER, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
5.7 MI W OF HOOKER, Texas, OK
Over: N. FORK FRISCO CREEK
.2W 3.2 MI S OF GOODWELL, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
.2S 7.8W OF TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: COLDWATER CREEK
4.9 N 3.7 W HITCHLAND, Texas, OK
Over: DRY CREEK
2.5N 3.W 2.9N OF HOUGH, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
5.9S 4.8W OF US56 & SH95, Texas, OK
Over: FORK OF FRISCO CREEK
6.5S OF GUYMON, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
4W 2N 1.7NW OF TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: PONY CREEK
3.5 MI E OF OPTIMA, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
.1E 6. MI S OF ADAMS, Texas, OK
Over: SAND CREEK
.1E 6.5N OF TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
4.8W 2.9N OF TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: FRISCO CREEK
11.5S 2.6W OF GUYMON, Texas, OK
Over: COW CREEK
2.5N 6.2W OF HOUGH, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
.3W 1.7N 2.5W 2N TEXHOMA, Texas, OK
Over: PONY CREEK
.9 MI S OF STRAIGHT, Texas, OK
Over: DRY SAND DRAW
0.2S 1.8W OF SH3 & US54, Texas, OK
Over: GOFF CREEK
3.5N .5E OF GUYMON, Texas, OK
Over: PONY CREEK
1.8 S 1.2 E OF STRAIGHT, Texas, OK
Over: U.P. R.R. UNDER
.2W OF OPTIMA, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
11.4 MI S KANSAS LINE, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
4S 1W 2.1SOF FOUR CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
0.2 MI E JCT SH 94, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
.1 MI N JCT US 64, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
1.5 MI N JCT US 64, Texas, OK
Over: TEEPEE CREEK
1. E 2.1 S OF 4 CORNERS, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
1.9 MI S KANSAS LINE, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
3.2 MI N JCT US 54, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
12.2E 4.1S OF HARDESTY, Texas, OK
Over: COLDWATER CREEK
0.4 MI E JCT SH 94, Texas, OK
Over: N. FORK FRISCO CREEK
5.4NE OF TEXAS S/L, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
5.9 MI NE JCT SH 3, Texas, OK
Over: BEAVER RIVER
5.9 MI NE JCT SH 3, Texas, OK
Over: LITTLE GOFF CREEK
12.5 MI E JCT SH 95 S, Texas, OK
Over: CREEK
1.4 MI S JCT US 64, Texas, OK
Over: PONY CREEK
9.9 MI N JCT US 64, Texas, OK
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainBridges is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. NBI condition categories reflect the latest reported inventory record, not a live safety, closure, or travel decision.