State profile · Below median Poor share

Minnesota bridge safety

Condition ratings, load ratings, and Poor-condition data for every public highway bridge in Minnesota, based on the FHWA National Bridge Inventory.

11,969
Public bridges
55.0%
Good condition
3.6%
Poor condition

Data updated May 2026

Total Bridges

11,969

Public highway bridges in Minnesota

Good Condition

55.0%

6,580 bridges rated 7-9

5.0pp vs 50% benchmark

Poor Condition

3.6%

435 bridges whose lowest applicable component is rated 0-4

-3.4pp vs national avg 7.0%

Minnesota vs national bridge condition

Minnesota - Good condition share 55.0%
National avg

Share of bridges rated 7-9 on the FHWA 0-9 scale (deck, superstructure, substructure all good).

Minnesota - Poor-condition share 12.1%
National avg

Lower is better. Bar maxes at 30% (worst-state ceiling). National average sits at 7.0%.

Condition Distribution

Minnesota63.7%32%GoodFairPoor
Bridge inventory deck-condition mix - Minnesota (FHWA NBI)

Counties (87)

Aitkin 85 Anoka 145 Becker 51 Beltrami 102 Benton 113 Big Stone 16 Blue Earth 178 Brown 98 Carlton 144 Carver 101 Cass 80 Chippewa 70 Chisago 42 Clay 166 Clearwater 35 Cook 40 Cottonwood 125 Crow Wing 47 Dakota 152 Dodge 120 Douglas 24 Faribault 143 Fillmore 261 Freeborn 72 Goodhue 264 Grant 28 Hennepin 980 Houston 113 Hubbard 17 Isanti 24 Itasca 76 Jackson 104 Kanabec 34 Kandiyohi 53 Kittson 109 Koochiching 53 Lac qui Parle 161 Lake 80 Lake of the Woods 59 Le Sueur 54 Lincoln 93 Lyon 222 Mahnomen 40 Marshall 208 Martin 155 McLeod 78 Meeker 58 Mille Lacs 107 Morrison 155 Mower 307 Murray 129 Nicollet 53 Nobles 299 Norman 140 Olmsted 346 Otter Tail 137 Pennington 45 Pine 158 Pipestone 182 Polk 260 Pope 46 Ramsey 318 Red Lake 55 Redwood 190 Renville 139 Rice 134 Rock 252 Roseau 137 Scott 130 Sherburne 48 Sibley 98 St. Louis 641 Stearns 225 Steele 127 Stevens 43 Swift 96 Todd 135 Traverse 115 Wabasha 138 Wadena 77 Waseca 74 Washington 112 Watonwan 155 Wilkin 191 Winona 221 Wright 74 Yellow Medicine 207

Minnesota vs nearby ranks

Adjacent states by Poor-condition share (lower share = better)

States are ranked by the share of bridges whose lowest applicable component rating is 4 or below. This describes recorded condition; it does not measure funding effectiveness or live crossing safety. States here sit immediately above and below Minnesota on the same metric.

VA

Virginia

3.03% top marginal rate
Structure
Progressive
Burden @ $100K
$14,122

AL

Alabama

3.35% top marginal rate
Structure
Progressive
Burden @ $100K
$13,471
Selected

MN

Minnesota

3.63% top marginal rate
Structure
Progressive
Burden @ $100K
$11,969

CT

Connecticut

3.95% top marginal rate
Structure
Progressive
Burden @ $100K
$4,277

TN

Tennessee

3.97% top marginal rate
Structure
Progressive
Burden @ $100K
$20,426

Bridges Needing Most Attention in Minnesota

Six lowest-condition bridges in Minnesota, ranked by the portal's composite display score. Inspection intervals are risk-based under current NBIS rules.

T 187

Poor

Over: OKABENA CREEK

0.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 18, Jackson, MN

Built 1905 Load: 2.9 t ADT: 10

M 8

Poor

Over: WELCOME CREEK

0.1 MI W OF CO LINE, Itasca, MN

Built 1919 Load: 3.3 t ADT: 10

CSAH 7

Poor

Over: SLEEPY EYE CREEK (JD #36

0.6 MI N OF JCT CR 66, Redwood, MN

Built 1965 Load: 3.3 t ADT: 117

M 330

Poor

Over: W SWAN RIVER

0.4 MI S OF JCT CR606, St. Louis, MN

Built 1921 Load: 3.3 t ADT: 24

CR 156

Poor

Over: MAPLE RIVER

0.1 MI S OF JCT CR 154, Blue Earth, MN

Built 1961 Load: 3.9 t ADT: 141

T 309

Poor

Over: TROUT RUN CREEK

0.9 MI E OF JCT CSAH43, Winona, MN

Built 1918 Load: 4.1 t ADT: 20

All Bridges in Minnesota

T 209

Good

Over: W FK LAC QUI PARLE RIVER

0.9 MI S OF JCT CSAH 12, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1992 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 8

T 84

Good

Over: CO DITCH # 97

0.7 MI E OF JCT CSAH 5, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1993 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 35

T 84

Good

Over: CO DITCH # 97

1.3 MI E OF JCT CSAH 5, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1994 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 35

T 150

Good

Over: W FK LAC QUI PARLE RIVER

0.9 MI E OF JCT CSAH 7, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1992 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 18

T 155

Good

Over: CANBY CREEK

0.8 MI E OF JCT CR 61, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1993 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 12

T 155

Good

Over: CANBY CREEK

0.8 MI W OF JCT CR 61, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1993 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 16

T 130

Good

Over: CROW CREEK

0.5 MI E OF JCT CSAH 7, Lac qui Parle, MN

Built 1994 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 21

CSAH 61

Good

Over: KNIFE RIVER

AT KNIFE RIVER TOWNSITE, Lake, MN

Built 2000 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 1,317

CSAH 15

Good

Over: E BRANCH BEAVER RIVER

1.2 MI W OF JCT CSAH 4, Lake, MN

Built 1998 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 402

CSAH 11

Good

Over: KNIFE RIVER

0.4 MI W OF JCT CSAH 12, Lake, MN

Built 2004 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 443

CSAH 3

Good

Over: E SPLIT ROCK RIVER

7.2 MI SW OF JCT CSAH 4, Lake, MN

Built 2010 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 260

CSAH 2

Good

Over: LANGLEY RIVER

8.8 MI N JCT CSAH 14, Lake, MN

Built 2007 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 719

CSAH 2

Good

Over: CLOQUET RIVER

2.3 MI S JCT CSAH 16, Lake, MN

Built 2007 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 719

CSAH 15

Good

Over: CLOQUET RIVER

1.6 MI SE OF JCT CSAH 2, Lake, MN

Built 1989 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 400

MN 169

Good

Over: SHAGAWA RIVER

0.1 MI E OF W CO LINE, Lake, MN

Built 1992 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 1,250

UT 32

Good

Over: WINTER ROAD RIVER

0.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 3, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 1996 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 34

UT 103

Good

Over: BAUDETTE RIVER

0.3 MI E OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 1996 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 15

UT 47

Good

Over: PEPPERMINT CREEK

0.4 MI S OF JCT CSAH 3, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 1999 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 15

UT 143

Good

Over: S Fk Baudette River

1.7 MI SN OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2000 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

UT 143

Good

Over: BAUDETTE RIVER

2.6 MI SW OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2000 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

UT 53

Good

Over: Peppermint Creek

0.5 mi S of jct CSAH 3, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2001 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 5

CSAH 17

Good

Over: DITCH

10 MI N ROOSEVELT, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2003 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 306

UT 143

Good

Over: BAUDETTE RIVER

0.3 MI W OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2006 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

UT 335

Good

Over: CHRISTY CREEK

0.3 MI N OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 2006 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

CSAH 1

Good

Over: W FK BAUDETTE RIVER

0.5 MI S OF JCT CSAH 3, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 1991 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 280

CSAH 5

Good

Over: BAUDETTE RIVER

1.7 MI S OF JCT CSAH 1, Lake of the Woods, MN

Built 1994 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 113

CSAH 41

Good

Over: SHANASKA CREEK

0.3 MI W OF JCT TH 22, Le Sueur, MN

Built 1981 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 339

CSAH 26

Good

Over: LE SUEUR CREEK

1.6 MI E OF JCT TH 112, Le Sueur, MN

Built 1995 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 1,050

T 71

Good

Over: LE SUEUR CREEK

1.7 MI NW OF JCT CR 112, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2000 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 48

CSAH 28

Good

Over: SAND CRK (CD # 54)

0.3 MI W OF JCT CR 146, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2005 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 2,891

CR 113

Good

Over: LE SUEUR CREEK

0.8 MI N JCT MN 112, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2007 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 36

T 129

Good

Over: SHANASKA CREEK

0.3 MI S OF JCT CSAH 18, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2004 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 10

T 44

Good

Over: LE SUEUR CREEK

0.3 MI E OF JCT CR 152, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2004 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 96

MN 13

Good

Over: CO DITCH # 62

IN NEW PRAGUE AT JCT TH1, Le Sueur, MN

Built 1995 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 6,360

T 71

Good

Over: LeSueur Creek

0.2 MI W OR JCT CR 112, Le Sueur, MN

Built 2000 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 48

CR 145

Good

Over: SAND CREEK

1.8 MI E OF JCT TH 13, Le Sueur, MN

Built 1994 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 175

T 93

Good

Over: YELLOW MEDICINE RIVER

0.7 MI S OF JCT CSAH 19, Lincoln, MN

Built 1999 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 27

T 133

Good

Over: MEDARY CREEK

0.8 MI N OF JCT CSAH 10, Lincoln, MN

Built 2003 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 50

CSAH 7

Good

Over: COON CREEK

0.8 MI S OF JCT CR 123, Lincoln, MN

Built 2005 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 290

T 3

Good

Over: SPRING CREEK

0.4 MI W OF JCT CSAH 1, Lincoln, MN

Built 2005 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 25

T 117

Good

Over: N BR YELLOW MEDICINE R

1.5 MI S OF JCT CSAH 18, Lincoln, MN

Built 2006 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 25

T 29

Good

Over: COON CREEK

0.4 MI W OF JCT CSAH 7, Lincoln, MN

Built 2006 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 20

T 38

Good

Over: JUD DITCH # 29

1.2 MI W OF JCT CSAH 8, Lincoln, MN

Built 2006 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 20

T 94

Good

Over: STREAM

0.6 MI S OF JCT CSAH 9, Lincoln, MN

Built 2011 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

CSAH 12

Good

Over: NORWEGIAN CREEK

0.2 MI E OF JCT US 75, Lincoln, MN

Built 2009 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 85

T 138

Good

Over: SPRING CREEK

0.8 MI N OF S CO LINE, Lincoln, MN

Built 2011 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

CSAH 7

Good

Over: STREAM

1.1 MI N OF JCT CSAH 19, Lincoln, MN

Built 2012 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 107

CSAH 7

Good

Over: N BR YELLOW MEDICINE R

0.7 MI S OF JCT CSAH 16, Lincoln, MN

Built 2012 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 107

T 49

Good

Over: N BR YELLOW MEDICINE R

1.8 MI E OF JCT CR 102, Lincoln, MN

Built 2012 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 49

CSAH 7

Good

Over: S BR YELLOW MEDICINE R

0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 19, Lincoln, MN

Built 1985 Load: 39.2 t ADT: 230

Showing 8,751-8,800 of 11,969 bridges

Related

All states → | National rankings → | Understanding conditions → | Retired SD term explained →
Data sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI), latest released cycle. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBridges.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NBI). Poor condition is an inspection-record category, not a closure or unsafe-to-cross designation. Consult the bridge owner for current status.

Understanding Bridge Conditions

How FHWA rates bridge condition on a 0-9 scale.

Check Your Daily Bridges

How to look up bridge condition data for bridges on your route.

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Every figure on PlainBridge is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.